ArticleJournal of Korean Academy of Nursing2021
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff for Nurses].
Article in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Predictive Model for Nursing Students' Person-Centered Care Competency: Focusing on Patients with Dementia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of Moral Distress, Person-Centred Care, and Nursing Professional Pride on Turnover Intention Among Intensive Care Unit Nurses in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influence of Self-Compassion, Burden of BPSD, Communication Behavior, and Nursing Work Environment on Person-Centered Care for Patients with Dementia Among Long-Term Care Hospital Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Psychometric validation and cultural adaptation of the family-centered care Questionnaire-Revised for use among nurses in Saudi Arabia.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Person-centered Practice Inventory-Staff for Brazilian culture.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing Person-Centered Care Among Psychiatric Nurses in Hospitals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Person-Centred Care: A Support Strategy for Managing Non-Communicable Diseases.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [Translation and transcultural adaptation of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory Staff (PCPI-S) for health professionals in Spain].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2023Article
- Validation of the Korean Version of Patient-Centered Care Tool: For Outpatients.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- [Translation and transcultural adaptation of the theoretical Person-Centred Practice Framework to the Spanish context].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2022Article
- Factors Associated with Person-Centered Care among Hospice Nurses.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S) for nurses.
methodsThe English PCPI-S was translated into Korean with forward and backward translation. Data were collected from 338 nurses at one general hospital in Korea. Construct validity was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Known-group validity was also evaluated. Cronbach's α was used to assess the reliability.
resultsThe PCPI-S Korean version consisted of 51 items in three areas: prerequisites, the care environment, and person-centered process. The comparative fit index (CFI) and values of person-centered care process were improved after engagement and having sympathetic presence items were combined as one component. The construct validity of PCPI-S Korean version was verified using four-factor structures (.05 < RMSEA < .10, AGFI > .70, CFI > .70, and AIC). The convergent validity and discriminant validity of the entire PCPI-S question were verified using a two-factor structures (AVE > .50, construct reliability > .70). There was an acceptable known-group validity with a significant correlation between the PCPI-S level and the degree of person-centered care awareness and education. Internal consistency was reliable with Cronbach's α .95.
conclusionThe Korean version of PCPI-S is valid and reliable. It can be used as a standardized Korean version of person-centered care measurement tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34215713What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.