Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215566›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2022

Psychosocial work factors and blood pressure among 63 800 employees from The Netherlands in the Lifelines Cohort Study.

Md Omar Faruque, Elisabeth Framke, Jeppe Karl Sørensen, Ida Elisabeth Huitfeldt Madsen, Reiner Rugulies, Judith M Vonk, H Marike Boezen, Ute Bültmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Omar FaruqueDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3806-6606
Elisabeth FramkeNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jeppe Karl SørensenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida Elisabeth Huitfeldt MadsenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Reiner RuguliesNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7752-131X
Judith M VonkDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
H Marike BoezenDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands h.m.boezen@umcg.nl.
Ute BültmannDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9589-9220
University Medical Center Groningen · NLNational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrevious studies on the association between psychosocial work factors and blood pressure mainly focused on specific occupations or populations and had limited sample sizes. We, therefore, investigated the associations between psychosocial work factors and blood pressure in a large general working population in the Netherlands.

methodsWe included 63 800 employees from the Netherlands, aged 18-65 years, with blood pressure measurements and a reliable job code at baseline. Psychosocial work factors (job strain, effort-reward imbalance (ERI) and emotional demands) in the current job were estimated with three recently developed psychosocial job exposure matrices. To examine the associations, regression analyses adjusted for covariates (age, sex, body mass index, education, monthly income, pack-years, smoking, alcohol consumption and antihypertensive medication (not included for hypertension)) were performed.

resultsHigher job strain was associated with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (B (regression coefficients) (95% CI) 2.14 (1.23 to 3.06)) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (B (95% CI) 1.26 (0.65 to 1.86)) and with higher odds of hypertension (OR (95% CI) 1.43 (1.17 to 1.74)). Higher ERI was associated with higher DBP (B (95% CI) 4.37 (3.05 to 5.68)), but not with SBP or hypertension. Higher emotional demands were associated with lower SBP (B (95% CI) -0.90 (-1.14 to -0.66)) and lower odds of hypertension ((OR) (95% CI) 0.91 (0.87 to 0.96)).

conclusionsIn the general working population, employees in jobs with high job strain and ERI have higher blood pressure compared with employees with low job strain and ERI. Emotional demands at work are inversely associated with blood pressure.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedBlood PressureCohort StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNetherlandsYoung Adultblood pressurehypertensionoccupational health

Identifiers

PMID34215566
PMCPMC8666827
OpenAlexW3173553672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.