ReviewRheumatic diseases clinics of North America2021
Lupus Cohorts.
Review in Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Profile of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus patients with a special reference to monogenic lupus and lupus nephritis: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Translational immunology: Applying fundamental discoveries to human health and autoimmune diseases.European journal of immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Large cohorts with diverse ethnic backgrounds and heterogenous clinical features have provided the real-life data about the safety and efficacy of various treatment regimens for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). There are multiple well-established regional, national, and international lupus cohorts that have made significant contributions to the understanding of SLE. Using social media for cohort-based studies can significantly increase the outreach in a short time period for studying rare diseases such as SLE. Lack of strict inclusion criteria allows study of a broad range of patients but selection bias and incomplete data are possible in long-term cohort studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.