ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2021
Relation of Intravascular Volume Profiles to Heart Failure Progression and Clinical Outcomes.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Significance of Estimated Plasma Volume Status in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Latent transition analysis of home-based fluid management during the vulnerable phase in patients with chronic heart failure: impact on symptom burden.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Association Between Insulin Therapy and In-Hospital Death in Chronic Heart Failure Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Mediated by Plasma Volume.Journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Assessing congestion using estimated plasma volume status: Ready for prime time?ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Differences in red blood cell mass profiles impact intravascular volume and outcome risk in chronic heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Measurement of Blood Volume in Patients with Heart Failure: Clinical Relevance, Surrogates, Historical Background and Contemporary Methodology.Heart international · 2023Review
- Clinically unrecognized plasma volume expansion predicts long-term all-cause-mortality in chronic heart failure.Clinical cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) commonly progresses over time and identifying differences in volume profiles may help stratify risk and guide therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the pathophysiologic and prognostic roles of volume profiles for HF progression in stable ambulatory and hospitalized patients. HF patients who had undergone quantitative intravascular volume analysis (185 outpatients and 139 inpatients) were retrospectively assessed for the combined end point of HF-related hospital admissions (outpatients), HF-readmissions (inpatients), and overall all-cause mortality. After multivariate Cox regression analysis, greater total blood volume expansion was associated with higher risk of HF-admission in previously stable outpatients (HR: 1.023, CI 1.005 to 1.043; p = 0.013) while in more advanced HF (inpatients) total blood volume expansion was associated with lower risk for HF-readmission and mortality (HR: 0.982, CI 0.967 to 0.997; p = 0.017). Secondary analysis suggests that subclinical plasma volume expansion was a driving factor for the detrimental association in outpatients (HR: 1.018, CI 0.997 to 1.036; p = 0.054), while an increase in red blood cell mass was central to the beneficial association in advanced HF (HR: 0.979, CI 0.968 to 0.991; p <0.001). In conclusion, understanding differences in plasma volume and red blood cell mass profiles can provide insight into the pathophysiology and progression of HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.