Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215345›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials research2021

Evaluation of two microcosm systems for co-treatment of LDPE

Alejandra Castillo-Toro, Juan F Mateus-Maldonado, Diana N Céspedes-Bernal, Leonardo Peña-Carranza, Adriana I Páez-Morales, Raúl A Poutou-Piñales, Juan C Salcedo-Reyes, Lucía A Díaz-Ariza, Laura C Castillo-Carvajal, Aura M Pedroza-Rodríguez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 64% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guadua angustifolia biochar/TiOScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandra Castillo-ToroLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA). Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan F Mateus-MaldonadoLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA). Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diana N Céspedes-BernalLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA). Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Leonardo Peña-CarranzaLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA). Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Adriana I Páez-MoralesLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA). Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Raúl A Poutou-PiñalesLaboratorio de Biotecnología Molecular, Grupo de Biotecnología Ambiental e Industrial (GBAI). Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Juan C Salcedo-ReyesLaboratorio de Películas Delgadas y Nanofotónica. Departamento de Física. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Lucía A Díaz-ArizaLaboratorio de Interacciones Planta Suelo Microorganismos (LAMIC), Grupo de Investigación en Agricultura Biológica. Departamento de Biología. Facultad de Ciencias, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Laura C Castillo-CarvajalFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac Campus Norte, Huixquilucan, Estado de México, Mexico.
Aura M Pedroza-RodríguezLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA). Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia. apedroza@javeriana.edu.co.
Luis D Gómez-MéndezLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA). Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia. luis.gomez@javeriana.edu.co.
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana · COUniversidad Anáhuac · MXUniversidad de Los Andes · CO

Funding

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana 00006736Pontificia Universidad Javeriana 00007681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe co-transformation of solid waste of natural and anthropogenic origin can be carried out through solid-state-fermentation systems to obtain bio-products with higher added value and lower environmental impact.

methodsTo evaluate the effect of Pleurotus ostreatus on co-transformation of oxo-degradable low-density polyethylene (LDPE

resultsFor HMS, the decrease in static contact angle (SCA) was 63.63% (p = 0.00824) and for VMS 74.45% (p = 0.00219), concerning the pristine. Plastic roughness in VMS was higher (26%) concerning the control. Throughout the 135 days, there were fungal growth and consequently laccase (Lac), manganese peroxidase (MnP) and lignin peroxidase (LiP) activities. During the first 75 days, CO

conclusionsFinally, the biochar or the biochar enriched with low concentrations of plant growth-promoting microorganisms and inorganic fertilizer favours the germination of Dianthus caryophyllus and Lolium sp., seeds.

Indexed as

Germination testMalachite greenOxo-biodegradable low-density polyethylenePlastic roughness

Identifiers

PMID34215345
PMCPMC8253244
OpenAlexW3176693661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.