Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215330›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2021

Development of a web-based contact tracing and point-of-care-testing workflow for SARS-CoV-2 at a German University Hospital.

Julian Zirbes, Christian M Sterr, Marcus Steller, Laura Dapper, Claudia Nonnenmacher-Winter, Frank Günther

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julian Zirbes *Division of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Marburg University Hospital, Baldingerstrasse 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Christian M Sterr *Division of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Marburg University Hospital, Baldingerstrasse 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Marcus StellerDivision of Information Technology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Laura DapperDivision of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Marburg University Hospital, Baldingerstrasse 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Claudia Nonnenmacher-WinterDivision of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Marburg University Hospital, Baldingerstrasse 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Frank GüntherDivision of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Marburg University Hospital, Baldingerstrasse 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany. frank.guenther@staff.uni-marburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7424-0950
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn late 2019, a novel coronavirus was detected in China. Supported by its respiratory transmissibility, even by people infected without symptomatic disease, this coronavirus soon began to rapidly spread worldwide.

backgroundMany countries have implemented different infection control and containment strategies due to ongoing community transmission. In this context, contact tracing as well as adequate testing and consequent quarantining of high-risk contacts play leading roles in containing the virus by interrupting infection chains. This approach is especially important in the hospital setting where contacts often cannot be avoided and physical distance is usually not possible. Furthermore, health care workers (HCWs) usually have contact with a variety of vulnerable people, making it essential to identify infections among hospital employees as soon as possible to interrupt the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the facility. Several electronic tools for contact tracing, such as specific software or mobile phone apps, are available for the public health sector. In contrast, contact tracing in hospitals often has to be carried out without helpful electronic tools, and an enormous amount of human resources is typically required.

aimFor rapid contact tracing and effective infection control and management measures for HCWs in hospitals, adapted technical solutions are needed.

methodsIn this study, we report the development of our containment strategy to a web-based contact tracing and rapid point-of-care-testing workflow. RESULTS/

conclusionOur workflow yielded efficient control of the rapidly evolving situation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic from May 2020 until January 2021 at a German University Hospital.

Indexed as

Computer Communication NetworksInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalPandemicsPoint-of-Care TestingSARS-CoV-2Contact TracingCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingGermanyHospitals, UniversityHumansInfection ControlInfectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-PatientMobile ApplicationsPersonnel, HospitalReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionContact tracingDigital toolsHospital environmentSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34215330
PMCPMC8249834
OpenAlexW3149863516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.