Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215317›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and prognostic research2021

The development and validation of a prognostic model to PREDICT Relapse of depression in adult patients in primary care: protocol for the PREDICTR study.

Andrew S Moriarty, Lewis W Paton, Kym I E Snell, Richard D Riley, Joshua E J Buckman, Simon Gilbody, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Shehzad Ali, Stephen Pilling, Nick Meader and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04666662 (Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to PREDICT Relapse of Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04666662 completednot on this map

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to PREDICT Relapse of Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of YorkRan2021 to 2024Enrolled1,244ConditionsDepression
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andrew S MoriartyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England. andrew.moriarty@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-3262
Lewis W PatonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England.
Kym I E SnellCentre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England.
Richard D RileyCentre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England.
Joshua E J BuckmanCentre for Outcomes and Research Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, England.
Simon GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England.
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England.
Shehzad AliDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England.
Stephen PillingCentre for Outcomes and Research Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, England.
Nick MeaderCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, England.
Bob PhillipsCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, England.
Peter A CoventryDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England.
Jaime DelgadilloDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
David A RichardsInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, England.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
Dean McMillanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800472National Institute for Health Research (GB) DRF-2018-11-ST2-044Wellcome Trust 201292/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients who present with depression are treated in primary care by general practitioners (GPs). Relapse of depression is common (at least 50% of patients treated for depression will relapse after a single episode) and leads to considerable morbidity and decreased quality of life for patients. The majority of patients will relapse within 6 months, and those with a history of relapse are more likely to relapse in the future than those with no such history. GPs see a largely undifferentiated case-mix of patients, and once patients with depression reach remission, there is limited guidance to help GPs stratify patients according to risk of relapse. We aim to develop a prognostic model to predict an individual's risk of relapse within 6-8 months of entering remission. The long-term objective is to inform the clinical management of depression after the acute phase.

methodsWe will develop a prognostic model using secondary analysis of individual participant data drawn from seven RCTs and one longitudinal cohort study in primary or community care settings. We will use logistic regression to predict the outcome of relapse of depression within 6-8 months. We plan to include the following established relapse predictors in the model: residual depressive symptoms, number of previous depressive episodes, co-morbid anxiety and severity of index episode. We will use a "full model" development approach, including all available predictors. Performance statistics (optimism-adjusted C-statistic, calibration-in-the-large, calibration slope) and calibration plots (with smoothed calibration curves) will be calculated. Generalisability of predictive performance will be assessed through internal-external cross-validation. Clinical utility will be explored through net benefit analysis. DISCUSSION: We will derive a statistical model to predict relapse of depression in remitted depressed patients in primary care. Assuming the model has sufficient predictive performance, we outline the next steps including independent external validation and further assessment of clinical utility and impact. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04666662.

Indexed as

DepressionPredictive modelPrognosisPrognostic modelRecurrenceRelapse

Identifiers

PMID34215317
PMCPMC8254312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.