Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215289›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2021

Short and long-term outcomes of surgical intervention for empyema in the post-fibrinolytic era.

Caitlin J Cain, Marc Margolis, John F Lazar, Hayley Henderson, Margaret Hamm, Stefanie Malouf, Puja Gaur Khaitan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caitlin J CainDepartment of General Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington DC, 20010, USA.
Marc MargolisDepartment of General Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington DC, 20010, USA.
John F LazarDepartment of General Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington DC, 20010, USA.
Hayley HendersonDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington DC, 20010, USA.
Margaret HammDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington DC, 20010, USA.
Stefanie MaloufDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington DC, 20010, USA.
Puja Gaur KhaitanDepartment of General Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW (G253), Washington DC, 20010, USA. Puja.G.Khaitan@medstar.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8654-062X
Georgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen window thoracostomy (OWT) is indicated for patients with bronchopleural fistula (BPF) or trapped lung in the setting of empyema refractory to non-surgical interventions. We investigated the role of OWT in the era of minimally invasive surgeries, endobronchial valves and fibrinolytic therapy.

methodsA retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent OWT at a single institution from 2010 to 2020 was performed. Indications for the procedure as well as operative details and morbidity and mortality were evaluated to determine patient outcomes for OWT.

resultsEighteen patients were identified for the study. The most common indication for OWT was post-resectional BPF (n = 9). Prior to OWT, n = 11 patients failed other surgical or minimally invasive interventions. Patient comorbidities were quantified with the Charlson Comorbidity index (n = 11 score ≥ 5, 10-year survival ≤21%). Three (16.7%) patients died < 30 days post-operatively and 12 (66%) patients were deceased by the study's end (overall survival 24.0 ± 32.2 months). Mean number of ribs resected were 2.5 ± 1.2 (range 1-6) with one patient having 6 ribs removed. Patients were managed with negative pressure wound therapy (n = 9) or Kerlix packing (n = 9). Eleven patients (61.6%) underwent delayed closure (mean time from index surgery to closure 4.8 ± 6.7 months).

conclusionsOur study illustrates the significant comorbidities of patients undergoing OWT, the poor outcomes therein, and pitfalls associated with this procedure. We show that negative pressure wound therapy can be utilized as potential way to obliterate the pleural space and manage an open chest in the absence of an airleak; however, OWT procedures continue to be extremely morbid.

Indexed as

ThoracostomyAdultAgedBronchial FistulaComorbidityEmpyema, PleuralFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyPneumonectomyReoperationRetrospective StudiesRibsBronchopleural fistulaEmpyemaOpen window Thoracostomy

Identifiers

PMID34215289
PMCPMC8254344
OpenAlexW3164424170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.