Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215219›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

When birth is not as expected: a systematic review of the impact of a mismatch between expectations and experiences.

Rebecca Webb, Susan Ayers, Annick Bogaerts, Ljiljana Jeličić, Paulina Pawlicka, Sarah Van Haeken, Nazihah Uddin, Rita Borg Xuereb, Natalija Kolesnikova, COST action CA18211:DEVoTION team

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What Should Be Discussed When Considering a Vaginal Birth? A Delphi Consensus Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Informing Decision-Making About Caesarean Birth: A Delphi Study to Develop a Core Information Set.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebecca WebbCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK. Rebecca.Webb.2@city.ac.uk.
Susan AyersCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Annick BogaertsKU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Research Unit Women and Child, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Ljiljana JeličićCognitive Neuroscience Department, Institute for Research and Development "Life Activities Advancement Center", Belgrade, Serbia.
Paulina PawlickaDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Sarah Van HaekenKU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Research Unit Women and Child, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Nazihah UddinCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Rita Borg XuerebDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Natalija KolesnikovaCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
COST action CA18211:DEVoTION team

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 196250/11B6220N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy and childbirth are significant events in women's lives and most women have expectations or plans for how they hope their labour and birth will go. It is possible that strong expectations about labour and birth lead to dissatisfaction or other negative outcomes if these expectations are not met, but it is not clear if this is the case. The aim was therefore to synthesise prospective studies in order to understand whether unmet birth expectations are associated with adverse outcomes for women, their partners and their infants.

methodSearches were carried out in Academic Search Complete; CINAHL; Medline; PsycINFO, PsychArticles, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Forward and backward searches were also completed. Studies were included if they reported prospective empirical research that examined the association between a mismatch in birth expectations/experience and postnatal outcomes in women, their children and/or their partners. Data were synthesised qualitatively using a narrative approach where study characteristics, context and methodological quality were extracted and summarised and then the differences and similarities among studies were used to draw conclusions.

resultsEleven quantitative studies were identified for inclusion from nine countries. A mismatch between birth expectations and experiences was associated with reduced birth satisfaction. Three studies found a link between a mismatch and the development of postnatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The evidence was inconsistent for postnatal depression, and fear of childbirth. Only one study looked at physical outcomes in the form of health-related quality of life.

conclusionsA mismatch between birth expectations and experiences is associated with birth satisfaction and it may increase the risk of developing postnatal PTSD. However, it is not clear whether a mismatch is associated with other postnatal mental health conditions. Further prospective research is needed to examine gaps in knowledge and provide standardised methods of measuring childbirth expectations-experiences mismatch. To ensure women's expectations are met, and therefore experience a satisfying birth experience, maternity providers should provide sensitive care, which acknowledges women's needs and preferences, is based on open and clear communication, is delivered as early in pregnancy as possible, and enables women to make their own decisions about care.

trial registrationProtocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42020191081 .

Indexed as

AttitudeMotivationEmpirical ResearchFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyBirth expectationsBirth experiencesBirth plansBirth satisfactionMismatchPsychological outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34215219
PMCPMC8252193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.