Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215218›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Perinatal health care access, childbirth concerns, and birthing decision-making among pregnant people in California during COVID-19.

Mackenzie D M Whipps, Jennifer E Phipps, Leigh Ann Simmons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mackenzie D M WhippsDepartment of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA. mdwhipps@ucdavis.edu.
Jennifer E PhippsDepartment of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Leigh Ann SimmonsDepartment of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Goals for Reaching Optimal Wellness: GROWellR01NR017659 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SIMMONS, LEIGH ANN · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring public health emergencies, including the COVID-19 pandemic, access to adequate healthcare is crucial for providing for the health and wellbeing of families. Pregnant and postpartum people are a particularly vulnerable subgroup to consider when studying healthcare access. Not only are perinatal people likely at higher risk for illness, mortality, and morbidity from COVID-19 infection, they are also at higher risk for negative outcomes due to delayed or inadequate access to routine care.

methodsWe surveyed 820 pregnant people in California over two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) a 'non-surge' wave (June 2020, n = 433), and (2) during a 'surge' in cases (December 2020, n = 387) to describe current access to perinatal healthcare, as well as concerns and decision-making regarding childbirth, over time. We also examined whether existing structural vulnerabilities - including acute financial insecurity and racial/ethnic minoritization - are associated with access, concerns, and decision-making over these two waves.

resultsPregnant Californians generally enjoyed more access to, and fewer concerns about, perinatal healthcare during the winter of 2020-2021, despite surging COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations, as compared to those surveyed during the COVID-19 'lull' in the summer of 2020. However, across 'surge' and 'non-surge' pandemic circumstances, marginalized pregnant people continued to fare worse - especially those facing acute financial difficulty, and racially minoritized individuals identifying as Black or Indigenous.

conclusionsIt is important for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers to understand whether and how shifting community transmission and infection rates may impact access to perinatal healthcare. Targeting minoritized and financially insecure communities for increased upstream perinatal healthcare supports are promising avenues to blunt the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant people in California.

Indexed as

COVID-19Decision MakingEconomic StatusEthnicityHealth Services AccessibilityPerinatal CareAdolescentAdultBirth SettingCaliforniaFemaleHumansMinority GroupsParturitionPregnancyPrenatal CareCaliforniaChildbirthCOVID-19Decision-makingFinancial insecurityHealthcare accessPerinatalPregnancyRacial/ethnic minoritizationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34215218
PMCPMC8250556
OpenAlexW3176138734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.