Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215197›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Facilitating better postnatal care with women-held documents in The Gambia: a mixed-methods study.

Tiffany Gooden, Lotta Gustafsson, Fides Lu, Faith Rickard, Alice Sitch, Carole Cummins, Kebba Manneh, Amie Wilson, Christine MacArthur, Semira Manaseki-Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tiffany Gooden *Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Lotta Gustafsson *University of Birmingham Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Fides Lu *University of Birmingham Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Faith RickardUniversity of Birmingham Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Alice SitchInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Carole CumminsInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Kebba MannehKanifing General Hospital, Banjul, The Gambia.
Amie WilsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Christine MacArthurInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Semira Manaseki-HollandInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. S.ManasekiHolland@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen-held documents are a basic component of continuity of maternity care. The use and completion of women-held documents following discharge could improve treatment and care for postnatal women. Using a mixed-methods study design, we aimed to assess the number, type, quality and completeness of women-held discharge documents, identify factors contributing to document completeness and facilitators or barriers for effective use of the documents.

methodsDocuments given to women at discharge from three hospitals in the Greater Banjul Area, The Gambia, were reviewed for content and quality. All women completed a questionnaire on the use of the documents. Poisson regression was used to estimate factors predicting document completion. Semi-structured interviews (n = 21) and focus groups (n = 2) were carried out with healthcare professionals (HCPs).

resultsNearly all (n = 211/212; 99%) women were given a document to take home. The most complete document (maternal record) had on average 17/26 (65%) items completed and 10% of women held an illegible document. None of the women's sociodemographic or clinical characteristics predicted document completeness. The following facilitators for effective use of documents were identified from the women's responses to the questionnaire and interviews with HCPs: 94% of women thought written information is important, 99% plan to have postnatal check-ups and 67% plan to use their documents, HCPs understand the importance of the documents and were familiar with the document's use and content. The following barriers for effective use of documents were identified: HCPs had too many women-held documents to complete at discharge, there is no national protocol and HCPs think women do not understand the documents due to a lack of education and that women often lose or forget their documents.

conclusionsWomen-held documents are well established in The Gambia; though quality and completeness needs improving. Future research should determine the impact of using only one document at discharge, protocols and training on completeness, among other outcomes, and on ways to ensure all women are using the documents for their postnatal care.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CarePostnatal CareAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsGambiaHumansMedical RecordsParturitionPatient Discharge SummariesPregnancyQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesContinuity of careDischargeHandoverLow-income countryMaternity careMixed-methodsThe GambiaWomen-held documents

Identifiers

PMID34215197
PMCPMC8254330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.