Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34215163›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2022

Exploring how residential care facilities can enhance the autonomy of people with dementia and improve informal care.

Jogé Boumans, Leonieke C van Boekel, Marjolein Ea Verbiest, Caroline A Baan, Katrien G Luijkx

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Different views on collaboration between older persons, informal caregivers and care professionals.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jogé BoumansTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120694Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4430-9910
Leonieke C van BoekelTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120694Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
Marjolein Ea VerbiestTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120694Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
Caroline A BaanTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120694Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands; Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Katrien G LuijkxTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120694Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
Tilburg University · NLMinistry of Health Welfare and Sport · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesResidential care facilities (RCFs) strive to enhance autonomy for people with dementia and to enhance informal care provision, although this is difficult. This study explored how RCF staff can enhance autonomy and improve informal care by looking at the influence of interactions (contact and approachability between residents, staff members and informal caregivers) and the physical environment, including the use of technologies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA realist evaluation multiple-case study was conducted using document analyses, eight semi-structured interviews with staff members and relatives and 56 hours of observations of residents across two RCFs aiming to provide person-centred care. Realist logic of analysis was performed, involving Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations.

findingsThe behaviour, attitudes and interactions of staff members with residents and informal caregivers appeared to contribute to the autonomy of people with dementia and enhance informal care provision. The physical environment of the RCFs and the use of technologies were less relevant to enhancing autonomy and informal care provision, although they can support staff members in providing person-centred care in daily practice. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings add to those of other studies regarding the importance of interaction between residents, staff members and informal caregivers. The findings provide insight for other RCFs on how successfully to enhance autonomy for their residents and to improve informal care provision, as well as, more broadly, how to implement person-centred care.

Indexed as

Assisted Living FacilitiesDementiaCaregiversHumansNursing HomesPatient CareResidential Facilitiesautonomydementia (care) person-centred careinformal careinteractionsphysical environmentrealist evaluationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID34215163
PMCPMC8739616
OpenAlexW3174054852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.