ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2021
Tracking longitudinal language network reorganisation using functional MRI connectivity fingerprints.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of abnormal neural language networks by reading "brainprints" in patients with brain tumors.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Separating the forest from the palm trees: Individual variation in a presurgical language mapping task.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Longitudinal assessment of network reorganizations and language recovery in postoperative patients with glioma.Brain communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Large individual differences in how brain networks respond to treatment hinder efforts to personalise treatment in neurological conditions. We used a brain network fingerprinting approach to longitudinally track re-organisation of complementary phonological and semantic language networks in 19 patients before and after brain-tumour surgery. Patient task fingerprints were individually compared to normal networks established in 17 healthy controls. Additionally, pre- and post-operative patient fingerprints were directly compared to assess longitudinal network adaptations. We found that task networks remained stable over time in healthy controls, whereas treatment induced reorganisation in 47.4% of patient fluency networks and 15.8% of semantic networks. How networks adapted after surgery was highly unique; a subset of patients (10%) showed 'normalisation' while others (21%) developed newly atypical networks after treatment. The strongest predictor of adaptation of the fluency network was the presence of clinically reported language symptoms. Our findings indicate a tight coupling between processes disrupting performance and neural network adaptation, the patterns of which appear to be both task- and individually-unique. We propose that connectivity fingerprinting offers potential as a clinical marker to track adaptation of specific functional networks across treatment interventions over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.