ArticleMedical image analysis2021
Geodesic density regression for correcting 4DCT pulmonary respiratory motion artifacts.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- M4DTrack: A DICOM-Based Imaging Informatics Workflow for User-Supervised 4DCT Lung Tumor Motion Reporting.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- New reconstruction algorithm for stack artifact reduction in breathing-adaptive four-dimensional computed tomography.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- 4D CT acquisition methods and their anticipated effects on image quality in dynamic CT-scanning of the wrist.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Detection of phase-binning and interpolation artifacts in 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging using deep learning and rule-based approaches.Medical physics · 2025Article
- PixelPrint 4D : A 3D Printing Method of Fabricating Patient-Specific Deformable CT Phantoms for Respiratory Motion Applications.Investigative radiology · 2025Article
- RetinaRegNet: A zero-shot approach for retinal image registration.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- 4DCT image artifact detection using deep learning.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Optimized raw data selection for artifact reduction of breathing controlled four-dimensional sequence scanning.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Robust Measures of Image-Registration-Derived Lung Biomechanics in SPIROMICS.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary respiratory motion artifacts are common in four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) of lungs and are caused by missing, duplicated, and misaligned image data. This paper presents a geodesic density regression (GDR) algorithm to correct motion artifacts in 4DCT by correcting artifacts in one breathing phase with artifact-free data from corresponding regions of other breathing phases. The GDR algorithm estimates an artifact-free lung template image and a smooth, dense, 4D (space plus time) vector field that deforms the template image to each breathing phase to produce an artifact-free 4DCT scan. Correspondences are estimated by accounting for the local tissue density change associated with air entering and leaving the lungs, and using binary artifact masks to exclude regions with artifacts from image regression. The artifact-free lung template image is generated by mapping the artifact-free regions of each phase volume to a common reference coordinate system using the estimated correspondences and then averaging. This procedure generates a fixed view of the lung with an improved signal-to-noise ratio. The GDR algorithm was evaluated and compared to a state-of-the-art geodesic intensity regression (GIR) algorithm using simulated CT time-series and 4DCT scans with clinically observed motion artifacts. The simulation shows that the GDR algorithm has achieved significantly more accurate Jacobian images and sharper template images, and is less sensitive to data dropout than the GIR algorithm. We also demonstrate that the GDR algorithm is more effective than the GIR algorithm for removing clinically observed motion artifacts in treatment planning 4DCT scans. Our code is freely available at https://github.com/Wei-Shao-Reg/GDR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.