Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34214926›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2021

Structural perspectives on H

Aaron P Landry, Joseph Roman, Ruma Banerjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. HBiochemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Power and poison: The intersections of HThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. HThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. SQOR as a metabolic rheostat of HFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The CBS/HCommunications biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. HProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Regulation of Mitochondrial Respiration by Hydrogen Sulfide.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron P LandryDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Joseph RomanDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ruma BanerjeeDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: rbanerje@umich.edu.

Funding

Transsulfuration and HyperhomocysteinemiaR01HL058984 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BANERJEE, RUMA V · 1997 to 2020
$6.0M
Sulfide Oxidation and SignalingR35GM130183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RUMA V BANERJEE · 2019 to 2026
$3.6M
Enzymology of Sulfide OxidationR01GM112455 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BANERJEE, RUMA V · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
Medical Research Council FC001065NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL058984NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112455NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130183Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enzymes involved in H

Indexed as

Hydrogen SulfideCystathionine beta-SynthaseCysteineHomeostasisOxidation-ReductionCystathionine beta-SynthaseCysteineHydrogen Sulfide

Identifiers

PMID34214926
PMCPMC8648995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.