ArticleContraception2021
Changes in pregnancy desire after a pregnancy scare in a random sample of young adult women in a Michigan county.
Article in Contraception, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy Ambivalence, History of Pregnancy, Condom Use, and Contraceptive Use Among U.S. Youth Experiencing Homelessness.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Article
- A Multidimensional and Longitudinal Exploratory Study of the Stability of Pregnancy Contexts in the United States.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Pregnancy scares, pregnancy uncertainty, and abortion attitude change.Social science research · 2022Article
- Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.Open access journal of contraception · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe examined whether and how long young women became more or less likely to desire a pregnancy after experiencing a "pregnancy scare." STUDY
designWe used data from the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life (RDSL) study, based on a random, population-based sample of 992 young women from a county in Michigan. They were interviewed weekly for 2.5 years. We used fixed-effects logistic regression models to predict pregnancy desire after a pregnancy scare.
resultsOf the 759 sexually experienced women we analyzed, 103 (14%) experienced 128 pregnancy scares. A woman's (adjusted) odds of desiring a pregnancy were 3.70 (95% CI 2.27-6.02) times higher during the week after, 3.04 (95% CI 2.30-4.10) times higher during the month after a pregnancy scare, and 2.31 (95% CI 1.71-3.11) times higher during all weeks after the pregnancy scare, compared to her other weeks during the study period. In a final model directly comparing each period to all weeks before the pregnancy scare, the odds of pregnancy desire were highest (aOR 5.08, 95% CI 3.06-8.42) during the first week, slightly smaller (aOR 3.01, 95% CI 2.11 - 4.30) during the subsequent three weeks, and remained elevated (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.19-2.09) throughout the remainder of the study period.
conclusionsOur analyses suggest that the experience of a pregnancy "scare" does not scare young women away from wanting pregnancies. On the contrary, the state of possibly being pregnant actually made young women in our study more likely to want to be pregnant, on average. IMPLICATIONS: Very few young women desire a pregnancy during the transition to adulthood; however, a salient life event like a pregnancy scare can abruptly generate a desire for pregnancy. Our study contributes to efforts to help women implement their pregnancy desires by furthering our understanding of those desires and the contexts in which they are formed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.