Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34214548›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2022

Postprocedural Cognitive Load Measurement With Immediate Feedback to Guide Curriculum Development.

Lauren V Huckaby, Anthony R Cyr, Robert M Handzel, Eliza Beth Littleton, Lawrence R Crist, James D Luketich, Kenneth K Lee, Rajeev Dhupar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A scoping review of cognitive load assessment tools suitable for clinicians performing REBOA.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren V HuckabyDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Anthony R CyrDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert M HandzelDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Eliza Beth LittletonDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lawrence R CristDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Surgical Services Division, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
James D LuketichDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kenneth K LeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Rajeev DhuparDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Surgical Services Division, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: dhuparr2@upmc.edu.

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Vascular Surgery Research Training (VascTrain) ProgramT32HL098036 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Edith Tzeng · 2010 to 2026
$7.2M
Novel Use of Malignant Pleural Effusion Resident T cells for Systemic Adoptive Cell Transfer in Veterans with Lung CancerIK2CX001771 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI DHUPAR, RAJEEV · 2021 to 2024
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001771NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethods to assess competency in cardiothoracic training are essential. Here, we report a system that allows us to better assess competency from the perspective of both the trainee and educator. We hypothesized that postprocedural cognitive burden measurement (by the trainee) with immediate feedback (from the educator) could aid in identifying barriers to the acquisition of skills and knowledge so that training curricula can be individualized.

methodsThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), a validated instrument to measure cognitive load, was administered with an online platform after bronchoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for 11 residents. Immediate postprocedure feedback and standardized debriefing occurred for each procedure.

resultsMean NASA-TLX scores were highest (indicating greater cognitive load) for esophagogastroduodenoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (P < .001). When comparing subscale measures, mental demand was significantly higher for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (P = .026) compared with the other procedures, whereas physical demand was highest for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (P = .018). Self-reported frustration was similar for all case types (P = .247). Cognitive burden decreased with a greater number of procedures for bronchoscopy (P = .027). Significant improvement was noted by the trainee at the end of the rotation in self-assessed procedural competency and preparedness for thoracic board topics (all P < .05). Postprocedure feedback by the attending surgeon correlated with more frequent completion of self-evaluations by the residents.

conclusionsLongitudinal assessment of cognitive load in combination with postprocedural feedback identified barriers to skill acquisition for both residents and educators. This information allows for individualized rotation development as a step toward a competency-based curriculum.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencySurgeonsClinical CompetenceCognitionCurriculumFeedbackHumans

Identifiers

PMID34214548
PMCPMC8991377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.