Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34214540›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Light scattering in TIRF microscopy: A theoretical study of the limits to surface selectivity.

Jeremy J Axelrod, Daniel Axelrod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremy J AxelrodDepartment of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Daniel AxelrodDepartment of Physics and LSA Biophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: daxelrod@umich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In TIRF microscopy, the sample resides near a surface in an evanescent optical field that, ideally, decreases in intensity with distance from the surface in a pure exponential fashion. In practice, multiple surfaces and imperfections in the optical system and refractive index (RI) inhomogeneities in the sample (often living cells) produce propagating scattered light that degrades the exponential purity. RI inhomogeneities cannot easily be avoided. How severe is the consequent optical degradation? Starting from Maxwell's equations, we derive a first-order perturbative approximation of the electric field strength of light scattered by sample RI inhomogeneities of several types under coherent evanescent field illumination. The approximation provides an expression for the scattering field of any arbitrary RI inhomogeneity pattern. The scattering is not all propagating; some is evanescent and remains near the scattering centers. The results presented here are only a first-order approximation, and they ignore multiple scattering and reflections off the total internal reflection (TIR) surface. For simplicity, we assume that the RI variations in the z direction are insignificant within the depth of the evanescent field and consider only scattering of excitation light, not fluorescence emission light. The general conclusion of most significance from this study is that TIR scattering from a sample with RI variations typical of those on a cell culture alters the effective thickness of the illumination to only ∼50% greater than it would be without scattering. The qualitative surface selectivity of TIR fluorescence is largely retained even in the presence of scattering. Quantitatively, however, scattering will cause a deviation from the incident exponential decay at shorter distances, adding a slower decaying background. Calculations that assume a pure exponential decay will be approximations, and scattering should be taken into account. TIR scattering is only slightly dependent on polarization but is strongly reduced for the highest accessible incidence angles.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalRefractometryHumansMicroscopy, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID34214540
PMCPMC8391032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.