Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34214498›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2021

Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Rukmini Mukherjee, Anshu Bhattacharya, Denisa Bojkova, Ahmad Reza Mehdipour, Donghyuk Shin, Khadija Shahed Khan, Hayley Hei-Yin Cheung, Kam-Bo Wong, Wai-Lung Ng, Jindrich Cinatl and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Famotidine increases cellular phospho-tyrosine levels.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. HJournal of anesthesia · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rukmini MukherjeeInstitute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anshu BhattacharyaInstitute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Denisa BojkovaInstitute of Medical Virology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ahmad Reza MehdipourDepartment of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt, Germany.
Donghyuk ShinInstitute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Khadija Shahed KhanSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Hayley Hei-Yin CheungState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Kam-Bo WongState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Wai-Lung NgSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jindrich CinatlInstitute of Medical Virology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Paul P GeurinkOncode Institute and Department of Chemical Immunology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gerbrand J van der Heden van NoortOncode Institute and Department of Chemical Immunology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Krishnaraj RajalingamCell Biology Unit, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sandra CiesekInstitute of Medical Virology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Branch Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gerhard HummerDepartment of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt, Germany; Institute of Biophysics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ivan DikicInstitute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Branch Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: dikic@biochem2.uni-frankfurt.de.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEChinese University of Hong Kong · HKLeiden University · NLJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMax Planck Institute of Biophysics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apart from prevention using vaccinations, the management options for COVID-19 remain limited. In retrospective cohort studies, use of famotidine, a specific oral H2 receptor antagonist (antihistamine), has been associated with reduced risk of intubation and death in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. In a case series, nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 experienced rapid symptom resolution after taking famotidine, but the molecular basis of these observations remains elusive. Here we show using biochemical, cellular, and functional assays that famotidine has no effect on viral replication or viral protease activity. However, famotidine can affect histamine-induced signaling processes in infected Caco2 cells. Specifically, famotidine treatment inhibits histamine-induced expression of Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) in SARS-CoV-2 infected cells and can reduce TLR3-dependent signaling processes that culminate in activation of IRF3 and the NF-κB pathway, subsequently controlling antiviral and inflammatory responses. SARS-CoV-2-infected cells treated with famotidine demonstrate reduced expression levels of the inflammatory mediators CCL-2 and IL6, drivers of the cytokine release syndrome that precipitates poor outcome for patients with COVID-19. Given that pharmacokinetic studies indicate that famotidine can reach concentrations in blood that suffice to antagonize histamine H2 receptors expressed in mast cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils, these observations explain how famotidine may contribute to the reduced histamine-induced inflammation and cytokine release, thereby improving the outcome for patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

A549 CellsBinding SitesCaco-2 CellsChemokine CCL2Coronavirus 3C ProteasesFamotidineHeLa CellsHistamine AntagonistsHumansInterferon Regulatory Factor-3Interleukin-6Molecular Docking SimulationNF-kappa BProtein BindingSARS-CoV-2Signal Transduction3C-like protease, SARS coronavirusChemokine CCL2Coronavirus 3C ProteasesFamotidineHistamine AntagonistsInterferon Regulatory Factor-3Interleukin-6IRF3 protein, humanNF-kappa BTLR3 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 3antiviral signalingfamotidinehistamineSARS-CoV-2toll-like receptor

Identifiers

PMID34214498
PMCPMC8241579
OpenAlexW3175884245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.