Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34214236›Full record

ArticleBJU international2022

The BARCODE1 Pilot: a feasibility study of using germline single nucleotide polymorphisms to target prostate cancer screening.

Sarah Benafif, Holly Ni Raghallaigh, Eva McGrowder, Edward J Saunders, Mark N Brook, Sibel Saya, Reshma Rageevakumar, Sarah Wakerell, Denzil James, Anthony Chamberlain and 20 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05681416 (Prostate Cancer Prevention Clinic for Men With Risk of Familial Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05681416 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prostate Cancer Prevention Clinic for Men With Risk of Familial Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHeinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRan2023 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsProstate Cancer, Familial Prostate CancerArmsPanel sequencing, whole exome sequencing, whole genome sequencing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Can polygenic risk scores contribute to cost-effective cancer screening? A systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Uptake of Polygenic Risk Testing for Glaucoma in Unaffected Individuals.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Prostate cancer screening.Asian journal of urology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Screening for prostate cancer with a polygenic risk score].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Prostate Cancer: genetics in practice now and in the future.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Sarah BenafifOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1407-1697
Holly Ni RaghallaighOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Eva McGrowderOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Edward J SaundersOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Mark N BrookOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Sibel SayaOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Reshma RageevakumarOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Sarah WakerellOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Denzil JamesOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Anthony ChamberlainOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Natalie TaylorCancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Matthew HogbenCancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Barbara BentonCancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lucia D'MelloCancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kathryn MyhillCancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christos MikropoulosRoyal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.
Hywel Bowen-PerkinsShadbolt Park House Surgery, Worcester Park, UK.
Imran RafiThe Longcroft Clinic, Banstead, UK.
Michelle FerrisLane End Medical Group, Edgware, UK.
Andre BeattieDorking Medical Practice, Dorking, UK.
Shophia KuganolipavaMedwyn Surgery, Dorking, UK.
Tamsin SevenoaksBrockwood Medical Practice, Dorking, UK.
Juliet BowerLeith Hill Practice, Dorking, UK.
Pardeep KumarCancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Steven HazellCancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nandita M deSouzaMagnetic Resonance Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Antonis AntoniouDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Elizabeth BancroftOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5482-5660
Zsofia Kote-JaraiOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Rosalind EelesOncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBDorking Community Hospital · GBEdgware Community Hospital · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBSeacroft Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Worcester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the feasibility and uptake of a community-based prostate cancer (PCa) screening programme selecting men according to their genetic risk of PCa. To assess the uptake of PCa screening investigations by men invited for screening. The uptake of the pilot study would guide the opening of the larger BARCODE1 study recruiting 5000 men. SUBJECTS AND

methodsHealthy males aged 55-69 years were invited to participate via their general practitioners (GPs). Saliva samples were collected via mailed collection kits. After DNA extraction, genotyping was conducted using a study specific assay. Genetic risk was based on genotyping 130 germline PCa risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A polygenic risk score (PRS) was calculated for each participant using the sum of weighted alleles for 130 SNPs. Study participants with a PRS lying above the 90th centile value were invited for PCa screening by prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy.

resultsInvitation letters were sent to 1434 men. The overall study uptake was 26% (375/1436) and 87% of responders were eligible for study entry. DNA genotyping data were available for 297 men and 25 were invited for screening. After exclusions due to medical comorbidity/invitations declined, 18 of 25 men (72%) underwent MRI and biopsy of the prostate. There were seven diagnoses of PCa (38.9%). All cancers were low-risk and were managed with active surveillance.

conclusionThe BARCODE1 Pilot has shown this community study in the UK to be feasible, with an overall uptake of 26%. The main BARCODE1 study is now open and will recruit 5000 men. The results of BARCODE1 will be important in defining the role of genetic profiling in targeted PCa population screening. Patient Summary What is the paper about? Very few prostate cancer screening programmes currently exist anywhere in the world. Our pilot study investigated if men in the UK would find it acceptable to have a genetic test based on a saliva sample to examine their risk of prostate cancer development. This test would guide whether men are offered prostate cancer screening tests. What does it mean for patients? We found that the study design was acceptable: 26% of men invited to take part agreed to have the test. The majority of men who were found to have an increased genetic risk of prostate cancer underwent further tests offered (prostate MRI scan and biopsy). We have now expanded the study to enrol 5000 men. The BARCODE1 study will be important in examining whether this approach could be used for large-scale population prostate cancer screening.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesGerm CellsHumansMalePilot ProjectsProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenGWASprecision medicineprostate cancerscreeningSNPs

Identifiers

PMID34214236
PMCPMC9292247
OpenAlexW3173922075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.