ArticleJournal of microscopy2021
QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural, Compositional, and Dielectric State Profiling in Label-Free Single-Cell Monitoring.Small methods · 2026Review
- Monitoring microscope performance in an imaging facility using OMERO-metrics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spatially Controlled Capture and Site-Resolved Analysis of Single Extracellular Vesicles.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered microscopy: Transforming the landscape of parasitology.Journal of microscopy · 2026Review
- Biofilm Analysis by Confocal Microscopy-Basics and Practical Aspects.Microscopy research and technique · 2026Review
- Inductive bias influences the spatial scale of biological features learned from images.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Generation of In Vivo-Inspired 3D Collagen Models for Guided Tumor Invasion In Vitro.Current protocols · 2026Article
- Combinatorial sample- and back-focal-plane imaging. Pt. I: Instrument and acquisition parameters affecting BFP images and their analysis.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Bridging imaging-based in vitro methods from biomedical research to regulatory toxicology.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- SSBD: an ecosystem for enhanced sharing and reuse of bioimaging data.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- The importance of democratized resources in early-career training for bioimage analysts and bioimaging scientists.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Impact of Implementing Checklist Management Combined with SOP on Nursing Quality Among ENT Surgery Nurses.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Evaluation of image analysis tools for the measurement of cellular morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Trail-blazing and keeping pace: building, retaining and expanding image analysis expertise.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- High-throughput image processing software for the study of nuclear architecture and gene expression.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses.Nature methods · 2024Review
- Fully automated point spread function analysis using PyCalibrate.Biology open · 2023Article
- Successful 3D imaging of cleared biological samples with light sheet fluorescence microscopy.The Journal of cell biology · 2023Review
- Article
- OME-Zarr: a cloud-optimized bioimaging file format with international community support.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
100 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A modern day light microscope has evolved from a tool devoted to making primarily empirical observations to what is now a sophisticated , quantitative device that is an integral part of both physical and life science research. Nowadays, microscopes are found in nearly every experimental laboratory. However, despite their prevalent use in capturing and quantifying scientific phenomena, neither a thorough understanding of the principles underlying quantitative imaging techniques nor appropriate knowledge of how to calibrate, operate and maintain microscopes can be taken for granted. This is clearly demonstrated by the well-documented and widespread difficulties that are routinely encountered in evaluating acquired data and reproducing scientific experiments. Indeed, studies have shown that more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to repeat another scientist's experiments, while more than half have even failed to reproduce their own experiments. One factor behind the reproducibility crisis of experiments published in scientific journals is the frequent underreporting of imaging methods caused by a lack of awareness and/or a lack of knowledge of the applied technique. Whereas quality control procedures for some methods used in biomedical research, such as genomics (e.g. DNA sequencing, RNA-seq) or cytometry, have been introduced (e.g. ENCODE), this issue has not been tackled for optical microscopy instrumentation and images. Although many calibration standards and protocols have been published, there is a lack of awareness and agreement on common standards and guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility. In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for instruments and images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to establish a set of common QC standards, guidelines, metadata models and tools, including detailed protocols, with the ultimate aim of improving reproducible advances in scientific research. This White Paper (1) summarizes the major obstacles identified in the field that motivated the launch of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative; (2) identifies the urgent need to address these obstacles in a grassroots manner, through a community of stakeholders including, researchers, imaging scientists, bioimage analysts, bioimage informatics developers, corporate partners, funding agencies, standards organizations, scientific publishers and observers of such; (3) outlines the current actions of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative and (4) proposes future steps that can be taken to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the proposed guidelines to manage QC. To summarize, the principal goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of light microscope image data by introducing broadly accepted standard practices and accurately captured image data metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.