ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Leveraging high-throughput screening data, deep neural networks, and conditional generative adversarial networks to advance predictive toxicology.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrated AIVIVE-PBPK-QIVIVE Framework with HTTK Validation for Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Neodymium Nitrate.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- AI snake oil? A risk/benefit analysis for toxicology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- AI-based methods for the assessment of DNA damage and repair mechanisms.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- Predicting arsenic and manganese contamination in private well water with Machine Learning: An integrated analysis of geologic, well construction, and permitting data.The Science of the total environment · 2025Article
- Transforming microfluidics for single-cell analysis with robotics and artificial intelligence.Lab on a chip · 2025Review
- Integrating network analysis and machine learning to elucidate chemical-induced pancreatic toxicity in zebrafish embryos.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
- A Review of the Applications, Benefits, and Challenges of Generative AI for Sustainable Toxicology.Current research in toxicology · 2025Review
- An in vitro and machine learning framework for quantifying serum albumin binding of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
- Bridging organ transcriptomics for advancing multiple organ toxicity assessment with a generative AI approach.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- TransOrGAN: An Artificial Intelligence Mapping of Rat Transcriptomic Profiles between Organs, Ages, and Sexes.Chemical research in toxicology · 2023Article
- Navigating the bridge between wet and dry lab toxicology research to address current challenges with high-dimensional data.Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Article
- Machine learning and structure-based modeling for the prediction of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase inhibition.iScience · 2022Article
- Article
- Machine learning-driven identification of drugs inhibiting cytochrome P450 2C9.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Development of the InTelligence And Machine LEarning (TAME) Toolkit for Introductory Data Science, Chemical-Biological Analyses, Predictive Modeling, and Database Mining for Environmental Health Research.Frontiers in toxicology · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence unifies knowledge and actions in drug repositioning.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021Review
- Quantum semi-supervised generative adversarial network for enhanced data classification.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are currently 85,000 chemicals registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Toxic Substances Control Act, but only a small fraction have measured toxicological data. To address this gap, high-throughput screening (HTS) and computational methods are vital. As part of one such HTS effort, embryonic zebrafish were used to examine a suite of morphological and mortality endpoints at six concentrations from over 1,000 unique chemicals found in the ToxCast library (phase 1 and 2). We hypothesized that by using a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) or deep neural networks (DNN), and leveraging this large set of toxicity data we could efficiently predict toxic outcomes of untested chemicals. Utilizing a novel method in this space, we converted the 3D structural information into a weighted set of points while retaining all information about the structure. In vivo toxicity and chemical data were used to train two neural network generators. The first was a DNN (Go-ZT) while the second utilized cGAN architecture (GAN-ZT) to train generators to produce toxicity data. Our results showed that Go-ZT significantly outperformed the cGAN, support vector machine, random forest and multilayer perceptron models in cross-validation, and when tested against an external test dataset. By combining both Go-ZT and GAN-ZT, our consensus model improved the SE, SP, PPV, and Kappa, to 71.4%, 95.9%, 71.4% and 0.673, respectively, resulting in an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.837. Considering their potential use as prescreening tools, these models could provide in vivo toxicity predictions and insight into the hundreds of thousands of untested chemicals to prioritize compounds for HT testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.