Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34214078›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Leveraging high-throughput screening data, deep neural networks, and conditional generative adversarial networks to advance predictive toxicology.

Adrian J Green, Martin J Mohlenkamp, Jhuma Das, Meenal Chaudhari, Lisa Truong, Robyn L Tanguay, David M Reif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI snake oil? A risk/benefit analysis for toxicology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Integrating network analysis and machine learning to elucidate chemical-induced pancreatic toxicity in zebrafish embryos.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. An in vitro and machine learning framework for quantifying serum albumin binding of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adrian J GreenDepartment of Biological Sciences, and the Bioinformatics Research Center, NC State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-1838
Martin J MohlenkampDepartment of Mathematics, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1268-7754
Jhuma DasMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3548-3105
Meenal ChaudhariDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9016-7549
Lisa TruongDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1751-4617
Robyn L TanguayDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6190-3682
David M ReifDepartment of Biological Sciences, and the Bioinformatics Research Center, NC State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7815-6767

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES025128 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Andrew R. Binder · 2015 to 2026
$18.3M
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Facility CoreP30ES030287 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie DeWitt · 2020 to 2026
$9.8M
Genetic Etiology of Cancer Drug ResponseR01CA161608 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI WILTSHIRE, TIM, WRIGHT, FRED A. · 2012 to 2021
$4.0M
Gene-Environment Interactions Causing Differential Susceptibility to Chemical Exposure in High-Throughput ScreeningR56ES030007 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI REIF, DAVID M · 2019 to 2019
$225k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161608NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES025128NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030287NIEHS NIH HHS R56 ES030007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently 85,000 chemicals registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Toxic Substances Control Act, but only a small fraction have measured toxicological data. To address this gap, high-throughput screening (HTS) and computational methods are vital. As part of one such HTS effort, embryonic zebrafish were used to examine a suite of morphological and mortality endpoints at six concentrations from over 1,000 unique chemicals found in the ToxCast library (phase 1 and 2). We hypothesized that by using a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) or deep neural networks (DNN), and leveraging this large set of toxicity data we could efficiently predict toxic outcomes of untested chemicals. Utilizing a novel method in this space, we converted the 3D structural information into a weighted set of points while retaining all information about the structure. In vivo toxicity and chemical data were used to train two neural network generators. The first was a DNN (Go-ZT) while the second utilized cGAN architecture (GAN-ZT) to train generators to produce toxicity data. Our results showed that Go-ZT significantly outperformed the cGAN, support vector machine, random forest and multilayer perceptron models in cross-validation, and when tested against an external test dataset. By combining both Go-ZT and GAN-ZT, our consensus model improved the SE, SP, PPV, and Kappa, to 71.4%, 95.9%, 71.4% and 0.673, respectively, resulting in an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.837. Considering their potential use as prescreening tools, these models could provide in vivo toxicity predictions and insight into the hundreds of thousands of untested chemicals to prioritize compounds for HT testing.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysNeural Networks, ComputerToxicologyAnimalsEmbryo, NonmammalianModels, ChemicalToxicity TestsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34214078
PMCPMC8301607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.