Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34214077›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

A benchmark dataset for canopy crown detection and delineation in co-registered airborne RGB, LiDAR and hyperspectral imagery from the National Ecological Observation Network.

Ben G Weinstein, Sarah J Graves, Sergio Marconi, Aditya Singh, Alina Zare, Dylan Stewart, Stephanie A Bohlman, Ethan P White

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ben G WeinsteinDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2176-7935
Sarah J GravesNelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3805-4242
Sergio MarconiDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8096-754X
Aditya SinghDepartment of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5559-9151
Alina ZareDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-7604
Dylan StewartDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Stephanie A BohlmanSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-7321
Ethan P WhiteDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broad scale remote sensing promises to build forest inventories at unprecedented scales. A crucial step in this process is to associate sensor data into individual crowns. While dozens of crown detection algorithms have been proposed, their performance is typically not compared based on standard data or evaluation metrics. There is a need for a benchmark dataset to minimize differences in reported results as well as support evaluation of algorithms across a broad range of forest types. Combining RGB, LiDAR and hyperspectral sensor data from the USA National Ecological Observatory Network's Airborne Observation Platform with multiple types of evaluation data, we created a benchmark dataset to assess crown detection and delineation methods for canopy trees covering dominant forest types in the United States. This benchmark dataset includes an R package to standardize evaluation metrics and simplify comparisons between methods. The benchmark dataset contains over 6,000 image-annotated crowns, 400 field-annotated crowns, and 3,000 canopy stem points from a wide range of forest types. In addition, we include over 10,000 training crowns for optional use. We discuss the different evaluation data sources and assess the accuracy of the image-annotated crowns by comparing annotations among multiple annotators as well as overlapping field-annotated crowns. We provide an example submission and score for an open-source algorithm that can serve as a baseline for future methods.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualForestsTreesAlgorithmsEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOptical Imaging

Identifiers

PMID34214077
PMCPMC8282040
OpenAlexW3176105227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.