Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34213708›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2021

Cross-amplification of ungulate microsatellite markers in the endemic Indian antelope or blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) for population monitoring and conservation genetics studies in south Asia.

Rahul De, Vinay Kumar, Kumar Ankit, Khursid Alam Khan, Himanshu Kumar, Nirmal Kumar, Bilal Habib, Surendra Prakash Goyal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul DeWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, PIN 248001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4518-9607
Vinay KumarWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, PIN 248001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-6991
Kumar AnkitWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, PIN 248001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8133-910X
Khursid Alam KhanWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, PIN 248001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6302-7329
Himanshu KumarWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, PIN 248001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-0921
Nirmal KumarWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, PIN 248001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-1707
Bilal HabibWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, PIN 248001, India. bh@wii.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-6214
Surendra Prakash GoyalWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, PIN 248001, India. goyalsp@wii.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2284-8796
Wildlife Institute of India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Indian antelope or blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) is endemic to the Indian subcontinent, inhabiting scrublands and dry grasslands. Most of the blackbuck populations are small, isolated, and threatened by habitat fragmentation and degradation. Management of such disjunct populations requires genetic characterization, which is critical for assessing hazards of stochastic events and inbreeding. Addressing the scarcity of such information on the blackbuck, we describe a novel panel of microsatellite markers that could be used to monitor blackbuck demography and population genetic parameters using non-invasive faecal sampling. We screened microsatellites (n = 40) that had been reported to amplify in bovid and cervid species using faecal samples of the blackbuck collected from Kaimoor Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh, India and its vicinities. We selected 12 markers for amplification using faecal DNA extracts (n = 140) in three multiplex reactions. We observed a mean amplification success rate of 72.4% across loci (92.1-25.7%) with high allele diversity (mean number of alleles/locus = 8.67 ± 1.03). Mean genotyping error rates across the markers were low to moderate (allelic drop-out rate = 0.09; false allele rate = 0.11). The proportions of first- and second-order relatives in the study population were 0.69% and 6.21%, respectively. Based on amplification success, genotyping error rates and the probability of identity (P

Indexed as

AnimalsAntelopesConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFecesGenetics, PopulationIndiaMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPopulation SurveillanceBlackbuckGrasslandsIndividual identificationMicrosatelliteNon-invasive genetic sampling

Identifiers

PMID34213708
OpenAlexW3174880705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.