Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34213645›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Neuropsychological assessment in pediatric oncology survivorship care: utilization of services, results of evaluation, and educational and behavioral health outcomes.

Kaitlin Oswald, Dylan Bitensky, Elizabeth Stuchell, Amy Edmonds, Annette Richard, Elise Hodges, Kimberley Heinrich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaitlin OswaldDepartment of Psychiatry, Neuropsychology Section, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. kaitliao@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-452X
Dylan BitenskyDepartment of Psychiatry, Neuropsychology Section, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Elizabeth StuchellDepartment of Psychiatry, Neuropsychology Section, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amy EdmondsDepartment of Psychiatry, Neuropsychology Section, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Annette RichardDepartment of Psychiatry, Neuropsychology Section, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Elise HodgesDepartment of Psychiatry, Neuropsychology Section, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kimberley HeinrichDepartment of Psychiatry, Neuropsychology Section, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuropsychological evaluation has become a standard component of long-term follow-up care for survivors of pediatric cancer. The purpose of the present study was to examine access to, and benefits of, neuropsychological evaluation for survivors.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on cancer survivors who were referred for neuropsychological evaluation from a multidisciplinary long-term follow-up (LTFU) clinic approximately 5 years following treatment cessation. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and t-tests and chi-square analyses were utilized to examine variables that may impact survivors' access to neuropsychological services.

resultsOne hundred seven survivors between 6 and 26 years old were referred for a neuropsychological evaluation. Referred male patients were less likely than female patients to schedule an evaluation. Consultation with a neuropsychologist in the LTFU clinic was related to more referrals but did not improve attrition rates (55%). Twenty-four percent of evaluated patients displayed severe cognitive impairment and 75% were diagnosed with a psychological disorder. Utilization of educational and behavioral health services did not significantly change following evaluation.

conclusionSurvivors' utilization of neuropsychological services is lower for males than females. The presence of a neuropsychologist in a multidisciplinary team clinic can improve identification of survivors that may benefit from neuropsychological evaluation. Many survivors did not receive recommended services, suggesting patients and families may need additional supports following evaluation. Future research should focus on improving survivors' access to neuropsychological services and identifying barriers to receiving recommended services.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSurvivorshipAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBehavioral healthEducational supportsNeuropsychological assessmentPediatric cancerSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID34213645
OpenAlexW3176913719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.