Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34213598›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2021

Genome sequences and in silico effector mining of Corynespora cassiicola CC_29 and Corynespora olivacea CBS 114450.

Thaís Carolina da Silva Dal'Sasso, Hugo Vianna Silva Rody, Pablo Enrique Grijalba, Luiz Orlando de Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Enhanced mercury phytoremediation by Pseudomonodictys pantanalensis sp. nov. A73 and Westerdykella aquatica P71.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic Characteristics and Comparative Genomics Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thaís Carolina da Silva Dal'SassoDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-5160
Hugo Vianna Silva RodyDepartamento de Genética, Universidade de São Paulo/Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Piracicaba, Brazil.
Pablo Enrique GrijalbaFacultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Luiz Orlando de OliveiraDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil. lorlando@ufv.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5578-2260
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidad de Buenos Aires · ARUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 142400/2018-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302336/2019-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 1684083Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-00150-17Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/04555-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placement of Corynespora olivacea within the large genus Corynespora (Pleosporales) is controversial, because the species is distantly related to other congeners, including the type species C. cassiicola. Corynespora cassiicola is a polyphagous, cosmopolitan plant pathogen. Successful colonization of plant tissues requires the pathogen's effector repertoire to modulate host cell physiology and facilitate the infection process. We sequenced and performed functional annotations on the genomes of C. cassiicola CC_29 (genome size about 44.8 Mb; isolated from soybean leaves) and C. olivacea CBS 114450 (32.3 Mb). Our phylogenomic approach showed that C. cassiicola is distantly related to C. olivacea, which clustered among the Massarinaceae family members, supporting a hypothesis that C. olivacea was originally misclassified. The predicted sizes for the proteome and secretome of C. cassiicola (18,487 and 1327, respectively) were larger than those of C. olivacea (13,501 and 920; respectively). Corynespora cassiicola had a richer repertoire of effector proteins (CAZymes, proteases, lipases, and effectors) and genes associated with secondary metabolism than did C. olivacea.

Indexed as

AscomycotaComputer SimulationPhylogenyGenome assemblyPhylogenomicsPlant-pathogen interactionProtein annotationSecondary metabolism

Identifiers

PMID34213598
OpenAlexW3174539400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.