ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Non-parametric modelling of temporal and spatial counts data from RNA-seq experiments.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variational sparse Gaussian-process method for detecting spatially variable genes and cellular interactions in spatial transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- SpaFun: discovering domain-specific spatial expression patterns and new disease-relevant genes using functional principal component analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Longitudinal omics data analysis: approaches and applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- JOINT IDENTIFICATION OF SPATIALLY VARIABLE GENES VIA A NETWORK-ASSISTED BAYESIAN REGULARIZATION APPROACH.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- Systematic benchmarking of computational methods to identify spatially variable genes.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Informatics at the Frontier of Cancer Research.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Review
- Benchmarking algorithms for spatially variable gene identification in spatial transcriptomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Categorization of 34 computational methods to detect spatially variable genes from spatially resolved transcriptomics data.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Single-cell omics: experimental workflow, data analyses and applications.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- Applications of AI to single-cell and spatial transcriptomics: current state-of-the-art and challenges.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Multimodal integration strategies for clinical application in oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Recent advances in spatially variable gene detection in spatial transcriptomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Detecting significant expression patterns in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics with a flexible computational approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- DESpace: spatially variable gene detection via differential expression testing of spatial clusters.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Multi-omics in stress and health research: study designs that will drive the field forward.Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- A SELECTIVE REVIEW OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SPATIALLY VARIABLE GENE DETECTION FOR SPATIAL TRANSCRIPTOMICS.ArXiv · 2023Article
- Spatial transcriptomics in development and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2023Review
- Principles and challenges of modeling temporal and spatial omics data.Nature methods · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe negative binomial distribution has been shown to be a good model for counts data from both bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Gaussian process (GP) regression provides a useful non-parametric approach for modelling temporal or spatial changes in gene expression. However, currently available GP regression methods that implement negative binomial likelihood models do not scale to the increasingly large datasets being produced by single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.
resultsThe GPcounts package implements GP regression methods for modelling counts data using a negative binomial likelihood function. Computational efficiency is achieved through the use of variational Bayesian inference. The GP function models changes in the mean of the negative binomial likelihood through a logarithmic link function and the dispersion parameter is fitted by maximum likelihood. We validate the method on simulated time course data, showing better performance to identify changes in over-dispersed counts data than methods based on Gaussian or Poisson likelihoods. To demonstrate temporal inference, we apply GPcounts to single-cell RNA-seq datasets after pseudotime and branching inference. To demonstrate spatial inference, we apply GPcounts to data from the mouse olfactory bulb to identify spatially variable genes and compare to two published GP methods. We also provide the option of modelling additional dropout using a zero-inflated negative binomial. Our results show that GPcounts can be used to model temporal and spatial counts data in cases where simpler Gaussian and Poisson likelihoods are unrealistic. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GPcounts is implemented using the GPflow library in Python and is available at https://github.com/ManchesterBioinference/GPcounts along with the data, code and notebooks required to reproduce the results presented here. The version used for this paper is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5027066. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.