ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Medical concept normalization in clinical trials with drug and disease representation learning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical registry metadata as a hidden bottleneck in AI-driven drug discovery: a computational audit of translational phase data in glioma research.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transformer-based relation extraction and concept normalization using an annotated clinical trials corpus.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A refined set of RxNorm drug names for enhancing unstructured data analysis in drug safety surveillance.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Mapping vaccine names in clinical trials to vaccine ontology using cascaded fine-tuned domain-specific language models.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- nach0: multimodal natural and chemical languages foundation model.Chemical science · 2024Article
- A Dataset for Evaluating Contextualized Representation of Biomedical Concepts in Language Models.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Mapping Vaccine Names in Clinical Trials to Vaccine Ontology using Cascaded Fine-Tuned Domain-Specific Language Models.Research square · 2023Article
- Mining of EHR for interface terminology concepts for annotating EHRs of COVID patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- An overview of biomedical entity linking throughout the years.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Review
- Combining human and machine intelligence for clinical trial eligibility querying.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Unsupervised SapBERT-based bi-encoders for medical concept annotation of clinical narratives with SNOMED CT.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationClinical trials are the essential stage of every drug development program for the treatment to become available to patients. Despite the importance of well-structured clinical trial databases and their tremendous value for drug discovery and development such instances are very rare. Presently large-scale information on clinical trials is stored in clinical trial registers which are relatively structured, but the mappings to external databases of drugs and diseases are increasingly lacking. The precise production of such links would enable us to interrogate richer harmonized datasets for invaluable insights.
resultsWe present a neural approach for medical concept normalization of diseases and drugs. Our two-stage approach is based on Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT). In the training stage, we optimize the relative similarity of mentions and concept names from a terminology via triplet loss. In the inference stage, we obtain the closest concept name representation in a common embedding space to a given mention representation. We performed a set of experiments on a dataset of abstracts and a real-world dataset of trial records with interventions and conditions mapped to drug and disease terminologies. The latter includes mentions associated with one or more concepts (in-KB) or zero (out-of-KB, nil prediction). Experiments show that our approach significantly outperforms baseline and state-of-the-art architectures. Moreover, we demonstrate that our approach is effective in knowledge transfer from the scientific literature to clinical trial data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We make code and data freely available at https://github.com/insilicomedicine/DILBERT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.