Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34213359›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2022

Compliance with recommendations limiting COVID-19 contagion among university students in Sweden: associations with self-reported symptoms, mental health and academic self-efficacy.

Anne H Berman, Marcus Bendtsen, Olof Molander, Petra Lindfors, Philip Lindner, Lilian Granlund, Naira Topooco, Karin Engström, Claes Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne H BermanDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-0230
Marcus BendtsenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
Olof MolanderCentre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Sweden.
Petra LindforsDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Philip LindnerCentre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Sweden.
Lilian GranlundDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Naira TopoocoDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Sweden.
Karin EngströmDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Claes AnderssonDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe COVID-19 containment strategy in Sweden uses public health recommendations relying on personal responsibility for compliance. Universities were one of few public institutions subject to strict closure, meaning that students had to adapt overnight to online teaching. This study investigates the prevalence of self-reported recommendation compliance and associations with self-reported symptoms of contagion, self-experienced effects on mental health and academic self-efficacy among university students in Sweden in May-June 2020.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional 23 question online survey in which data were analysed by multinomial regression, taking a Bayesian analysis approach complemented by null hypothesis testing.

resultsA total of 4495 students consented to respond. Recommendation compliance ranged between 70% and 96%. Women and older students reported higher compliance than did men and younger students. Mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms were reported by 30%, severe symptoms by fewer than 2%; 15% reported being uncertain and half of the participants reported no symptoms. Mental health effects were reported by over 80%, and changes in academic self-efficacy were reported by over 85%; in both these areas negative effects predominated. Self-reported symptoms and uncertainty about contagion were associated with non-compliance, negative mental health effects, and impaired academic self-efficacy.

conclusionsStudents generally followed public health recommendations during strict closure of universities, but many reported considerable negative consequences related to mental health and academic self-efficacy. Digital interventions should be developed and evaluated to boost coping skills, build resilience and alleviate student suffering during the pandemic and future similar crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthBayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Self EfficacySelf ReportStudentsSwedenUniversitiesacademic self-efficacyCOVID-19digital interventionsepidemiologyhigher educationmental healthpandemicsrecommendation compliancesocial medicinestudents

Identifiers

PMID34213359
PMCPMC8808007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.