Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212944›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2021

A critical overview of computational approaches employed for COVID-19 drug discovery.

Eugene N Muratov, Rommie Amaro, Carolina H Andrade, Nathan Brown, Sean Ekins, Denis Fourches, Olexandr Isayev, Dima Kozakov, José L Medina-Franco, Kenneth M Merz and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Molecular Crowding by Computational Approaches.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Eugene N MuratovUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. alex_tropsha@unc.edu.
Rommie Amaro
Carolina H Andrade
Nathan Brown
Sean Ekins
Denis Fourches
Olexandr Isayev
Dima Kozakov
José L Medina-Franco
Kenneth M Merz
Tudor I Oprea
Vladimir Poroikov
Gisbert Schneider
Matthew H Todd
Alexandre Varnek
David A Winkler
Alexey V Zakharov
Artem Cherkasov
Alexander Tropsha

Funding

Machine Learning Model Validation for AD/ADRDU24CA224370 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI EDWARDS, JEREMY S · 2018 to 2023
$6.4M
Resource Dissemination and Outreach Center for Illuminating the Druggable GenomeU24TR002278 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SCHURER, STEPHAN C, SKLAR, LARRY A. · 2018 to 2023
$3.7M
Centralized assay datasets for modelling support of small drug discovery organizationsR44GM122196 · NIGMS · COLLABORATIONS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Illuminating the Druggable Genome by Knowledge GraphsU01CA239108 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MUNGALL, CHRISTOPHER J, OPREA, TUDOR I · 2019 to 2021
$1.7M
A MULTISCALE APPROACH TO TARGET THE ACHILLES HEEL OF P53 CANCER MUTANTS (Equipment Supplement)R01GM132826 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AMARO, ROMMIE E · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
Drug Repurposing for Cancer Therapy: From Man to Molecules to ManU01CA207160 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TROPSHA, ALEXANDER · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR002278NCI NIH HHS U01 CA207160NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239108NCI NIH HHS U24 CA224370NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132826NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM122196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has resulted in huge numbers of infections and deaths worldwide and brought the most severe disruptions to societies and economies since the Great Depression. Massive experimental and computational research effort to understand and characterize the disease and rapidly develop diagnostics, vaccines, and drugs has emerged in response to this devastating pandemic and more than 130 000 COVID-19-related research papers have been published in peer-reviewed journals or deposited in preprint servers. Much of the research effort has focused on the discovery of novel drug candidates or repurposing of existing drugs against COVID-19, and many such projects have been either exclusively computational or computer-aided experimental studies. Herein, we provide an expert overview of the key computational methods and their applications for the discovery of COVID-19 small-molecule therapeutics that have been reported in the research literature. We further outline that, after the first year the COVID-19 pandemic, it appears that drug repurposing has not produced rapid and global solutions. However, several known drugs have been used in the clinic to cure COVID-19 patients, and a few repurposed drugs continue to be considered in clinical trials, along with several novel clinical candidates. We posit that truly impactful computational tools must deliver actionable, experimentally testable hypotheses enabling the discovery of novel drugs and drug combinations, and that open science and rapid sharing of research results are critical to accelerate the development of novel, much needed therapeutics for COVID-19.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug DesignDrug RepositioningAntiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Drug DiscoveryHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Antiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID34212944
PMCPMC8371861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.