Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212934›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature.

Olimpia Mani, Anna Maria Nucci, Michelangelo Scaglione, Enrico Bonicoli, Paolo Domenico Parchi, Nicola Piolanti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olimpia Mania:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:18:"University of Pisa";}. olimpia.mani@gmail.com.
Anna Maria Nucci. annamarianucci90@gmail.com.
Michelangelo Scaglione. michelangelo.scaglione@gmail.com.
Enrico Bonicoli. enrico.bonicoli@gmail.com.
Paolo Domenico Parchi. parchip@tiscali.it.
Nicola Piolanti. nicpio@hotmail.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this bibliometric study was to summarize European orthopedic literature produced by EFORT memberships between 2009 and 2019 and to identify the 100 most cited articles, analyzing the characteristics that made them so interesting for the orthopedic scientific world. Method A search of the literature was conducted using Clarivate Analytics Web of Science in the subject category "orthopaedics"; then the results were summarized using Web of Science tools. Results A total of 160.375 articles were found: most of these were produced by England. In particular the most prolific institution was the University of London. Analyzing in detail the 100 most cited publications emerged that most of them were review published in journal with high impact factor (Q1). The University of Oxford was the institution with the greatest number of contributions (13%). The most cited topics were osteoarthritis (24%), followed by orthopedic basic science (22%). Biomaterials was the most common topic by ordering the 100 analyzed articles according to "usage count", a recent indicator of the level of interest in a specific item. Conclusion This bibliometric study can be useful to identify topics of interest for future scientific research and to outline the features that make some publications more interesting than others.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsBibliometricsEnglandHumansPublications

Identifiers

PMID34212934
PMCPMC8343746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.