Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212901›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

Treatment of lumbar and intrathoracic meningocele: bioethical implications.

Cristina Tornali, Andrea Pratico', Flavio Vecchio, Agata Polizzi, Martino Ruggieri, Ignazio Vecchio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina TornaliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Italy. cristinatornali@unict.it.
Andrea Pratico'a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:21:"University of Catania";}. andrea.pratico@unict.it.
Flavio VecchioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Italy. flaviovecchio@unict.it.
Agata PolizziChair of Pediatrics, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Italy. agata.polizzi1@unict.it.
Martino RuggieriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Catania, Italy. m.ruggieri@unict.it.
Ignazio VecchioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Italy. ignaziovecchio@unict.it.
University of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelomeningocele is  a  congenital malformation caused by a developmental defect of the spinal cord structures. The exactcause is unknown, but different factors have been involved includingradiation, malnutrition, drugs. Myelomeningocele can develop at any point in the spine, but the lumbosacral region is affected in over 75% of cases. Chest X-raysand computed tomography study are mandatory to reveal tracheal malformations or associatedanomaliesof the ribs.  Treatment of myelomeningocele must be multidisciplinary  and involve at the same time neurologists, radiologists, neurosurgeons, thoracic surgeons, bioethical experts and take care of the childand also of the family. Some experiences concern the possibility of a in-utero correction of myelomeningocele, in order to avoiding serious and progressive damages to the nervoussystem.  Given the improvement of myelomeningocele management, the quality of life is nowadays more acceptable than in the past; however, some severe forms of myelomeningocele cannot still be corrected: in this cases, a "non-interventional" approach may require a form of passive euthanasia that should be discussed and approved with and by parents and  Any dissent of the parents must be respected and considered reasonable. The choice of a "non-intervention", which should be guaranteed to all the people capable of self-determination, is not however so immediate and direct in the case of the minor: the dissent expressed on his behalf by the parents or legal representative may be ethically difficult to be accepted.In this case, the best interest of the child must prevail as the goal of any therapeutic choice.

Indexed as

MeningoceleMeningomyeloceleChildHumansLumbosacral RegionQuality of LifeSpine

Identifiers

PMID34212901
PMCPMC8343732
OpenAlexW3175012171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.