Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212819›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Dopamine Receptors in Cancer: Are They Valid Therapeutic Targets?

Arely Rosas-Cruz, Nohemí Salinas-Jazmín, Marco A Velasco- Velázquez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Tumor-Targeting TACS omega · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists and radiation on mouse neural stem/progenitor cells.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arely Rosas-CruzDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México.
Nohemí Salinas-JazmínDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México.
Marco A Velasco- VelázquezDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México.ORCID 0000-0001-9717-0265
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXInstitute for Social Security and Services for State Workers · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dopamine receptors (DRs) family includes 5 members with differences in signal transduction and ligand affinity. Abnormal DRs expression has been correlated multiple tumors with their clinical outcome. Thus, it has been proposed that DRs-targeting drugs-developed for other diseases as schizophrenia or Parkinson's disease-could be helpful in managing neoplastic diseases. In this review, we discuss the role of DRs and the effects of DRs-targeting in tumor progression and cancer cell biology using multiple high-prevalence neoplasms as examples. The evidence shows that DRs are valid therapeutic targets for certain receptor/disease combinations, but the data are inconclusive or contradictory for others. In either case, further studies are required to define the precise role of DRs in tumor progression and propose better therapeutic strategies for their targeting.

Indexed as

AnimalsDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsReceptors, DopamineSignal TransductionDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsReceptors, Dopaminebreast cancerdopaminedopamine receptorDRD1DRD2glioblastomaNSCLCthioridazine

Identifiers

PMID34212819
PMCPMC8255587
OpenAlexW3176654394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.