Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212754›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2022

Performance validity in outpatients with multiple sclerosis and cognitive complaints.

I M Nauta, D Bertens, M van Dam, M Huiskamp, S Driessen, Jjg Geurts, Bmj Uitdehaag, L Fasotti, H E Hulst, B A de Jong and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combined cognitive rehabilitation and neurofeedback therapy: effects on executive function and cognitive flexibility in people with multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I M NautaAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5817-6696
D BertensDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands/Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
M van DamAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4639-5138
M HuiskampAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S DriessenAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jjg GeurtsAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bmj UitdehaagAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L FasottiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands/Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
H E HulstAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5039-1359
B A de JongAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M KleinAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuboptimal performance during neuropsychological assessment renders cognitive test results invalid. However, suboptimal performance has rarely been investigated in multiple sclerosis (MS).

objectivesTo investigate potential underlying mechanisms of suboptimal performance in MS.

methodsPerformance validity testing, neuropsychological assessments, neuroimaging, and questionnaires were analyzed in 99 MS outpatients with cognitive complaints. Based on performance validity testing patients were classified as valid or invalid performers, and based on neuropsychological test results as cognitively impaired or preserved. Group comparisons and correlational analyses were performed on demographics, patient-reported, and disease-related outcomes.

resultsTwenty percent displayed invalid performance. Invalid and valid performers did not differ regarding demographic, patient-reported, and disease-related outcomes. Disease severity of invalid and valid performers with cognitive impairment was comparable, but worse than cognitively preserved valid performers. Lower performance validity scores related to lower cognitive functioning, lower education, being male, and higher disability levels (

conclusionSuboptimal performance frequently occurs in patients with MS and cognitive complaints. In both clinical practice and in cognitive research, suboptimal performance should be considered in the interpretation of cognitive outcomes. Identification of factors that differentiate between suboptimal and optimal performers with cognitive impairment needs further exploration.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMultiple SclerosisCognitionHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsOutpatientscognitive impairmentMultiple sclerosisneuropsychological assessmentperformance validitysuboptimal performance

Identifiers

PMID34212754
PMCPMC8961248
OpenAlexW3175616646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.