Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212441›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2021

Dynamic assessment of the risk of airborne viral infection.

Alessandro Cammarata, Giuliano Cammarata

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A novel COBuilding and environment · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandro CammarataDipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Architettura, Univerità degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-7227
Giuliano CammarataDipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica, Elettronica e Informatica, Univerità degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper applies the Rudnick and Milton method through the dynamic evaluation of the probability of airborne contagion, redefining all parameters and variables in discretized form. To adapt the calculation of the risk of contagion to real needs, scenarios are used to define the presence of people, infected subjects, the hourly production of the quanta of infection, and the calculation of the concentration of CO

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorVirus DiseasesAerosolsAir MicrobiologyCOVID-19HumansRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2Aerosolsaerosol transmissionCoronaviruspandemicprobability of contagionSARS-CoV-2virus airborne transmission

Identifiers

PMID34212441
PMCPMC8597137
OpenAlexW3174217202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.