Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212275›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2021

Anti-angiogenesis in cancer therapeutics: the magic bullet.

Ayodipupo S Oguntade, Faez Al-Amodi, Abdullah Alrumayh, Muath Alobaida, Mwango Bwalya

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Green nanomedicine for cancer therapy.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  5. Extracellular Polymeric Substances Produced by Actinomycetes of the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Anti-Angiogenic Potential of MarineMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayodipupo S OguntadeNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. ayodipupooguntade@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8802-8590
Faez Al-AmodiInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
Abdullah AlrumayhInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
Muath AlobaidaInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
Mwango BwalyaInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiogenesis is the formation of new vascular networks from preexisting ones through the migration and proliferation of differentiated endothelial cells. Available evidence suggests that while antiangiogenic therapy could inhibit tumour growth, the response to these agents is not sustained. The aim of this paper was to review the evidence for anti-angiogenic therapy in cancer therapeutics and the mechanisms and management of tumour resistance to antiangiogenic agents. We also explored the latest advances and challenges in this field. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for publications on antiangiogenic therapy in cancer therapeutics from 1990 to 2020. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the master effector of the angiogenic response in cancers. Anti-angiogenic agents targeting the VEGF and HIF-α pathways include monoclonal antibodies to VEGF (e.g. bevacizumab), small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) e.g. sorafenib, decoy receptor or VEGF trap e.g. aflibercept and VEGFR2 inhibitors (e.g. ramucirumab). These classes of drugs are vascular targeting which in many ways are advantageous over tumour cell targeting drugs. Their use leads to a reduction in the tumour blood supply and growth of the tumour blood vessels. Tumour resistance and cardiovascular toxicity are important challenges which limit the efficacy and long-term use of anti-angiogenic agents in cancer therapeutics. Tumour resistance can be overcome by dual anti-angiogenic therapy or combination with conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Emerging nanoparticle-based therapy which can silence the expression of HIF-α gene expression by antisense oligonucleotides or miRNAs has been developed. Effective delivery platforms are required for such therapy. SHORT

conclusionClinical surveillance is important for the early detection of tumour resistance and treatment failure using reliable biomarkers. It is hoped that the recent interest in mesenchymal cell-based and exosome-based nanoparticle delivery platforms will improve the cellular delivery of newer anti-angiogenics in cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsEndothelial CellsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-angiogenesisAntiangiogenicsNanoparticleTumour resistanceVascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)

Identifiers

PMID34212275
PMCPMC13316910
OpenAlexW3174043581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.