ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
Glaucoma detection in Latino population through OCT's RNFL thickness map using transfer learning.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma: Bridging the diagnostic gap on structural imaging.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2022Pooled it
- Applications of machine learning in glaucoma diagnosis based on tabular data: a systematic review.BMC biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Multi-stage glaucoma classification using pre-trained convolutional neural networks and voting-based classifier fusion.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Federated Learning in Glaucoma: A Comprehensive Review and Future Perspectives.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGlaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. It is estimated that over 60 million people around the world have this disease, with only part of them knowing they have it. Timely and early diagnosis is vital to delay/prevent patient blindness. Deep learning (DL) could be a tool for ophthalmologists to give a more informed and objective diagnosis. However, there is a lack of studies that apply DL for glaucoma detection to Latino population. Our contribution is to use transfer learning to retrain MobileNet and Inception V3 models with images of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness map of Mexican patients, obtained with optical coherence tomography (OCT) from the Instituto de la Visión, a clinic in the northern part of Mexico.
methodsThe IBM Foundational Methodology for Data Science was used in this study. The MobileNet and Inception V3 topologies were chosen as the analytical approaches to classify OCT images in two classes, namely glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous. The OCT files were collected from a Zeiss OCT machine at the Instituto de la Visión, and classified by an expert into the two classes under study. These images conform a dataset of 333 files in total. Since this research work is focused on RNFL thickness map images, the OCT files were cropped to obtain only the RNFL thickness map images of the corresponding eye. This action was carried out for images in both classes, glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous. Since some images were damaged (with black spots in which data was missing), these images were cut-out and cut-off. After the preparation process, 50 images per class were used for training. Fifteen images per class, different than the ones used in the training stage, were used for running predictions. In total, 260 images were used in the experiments, 130 per eye. Four models were generated, two trained with MobileNet, one for the left eye and one for the right eye, and another two trained with Inception V3. TensorFlow was used for running transfer learning.
resultsThe evaluation results of the MobileNet model for the left eye are, accuracy: 86%, precision: 87%, recall: 87%, and F1 score: 87%. The evaluation results of the MobileNet model for the right eye are, accuracy: 90%, precision: 90%, recall: 90%, and F1 score: 90%. The evaluation results of the Inception V3 model for the left eye are, accuracy: 90%, precision: 90%, recall: 90%, and F1 score: 90%. The evaluation results of the Inception V3 model for the right eye are, accuracy: 90%, precision: 90%, recall: 90%, and F1 score: 90%.
conclusionIn average, the evaluation results for right eye images were the same for both models. The Inception V3 model showed slight better average results than the MobileNet model in the case of classifying left eye images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.