Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212254›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Liver-First Approach for Synchronous Colorectal Metastases: Analysis of 7360 Patients from the LiverMetSurvey Registry.

Felice Giuliante, Luca Viganò, Agostino M De Rose, Darius F Mirza, Réal Lapointe, Gernot Kaiser, Eduardo Barroso, Alessandro Ferrero, Helena Isoniemi, Santiago Lopez-Ben and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07224724 (Exosome-derived Extrahepatic Metastasis Detection By Liquid Biopsy In Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07224724 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Exosome-derived Extrahepatic Metastasis Detection By Liquid Biopsy In Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

TypeobservationalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2024 to 2028Enrolled500ConditionsColorectal Cancer Liver Metastases (CRLM), Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma (mCRC)ArmsEXELION
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Felice GiulianteHepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. felice.giuliante@unicatt.it.
Luca ViganòDivision of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Agostino M De RoseHepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Darius F MirzaHPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Réal LapointeHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Service, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gernot KaiserDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eduardo BarrosoHBP and Transplantation Centre, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon Central Hospitals Centre, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alessandro FerreroDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, "Umberto I" Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Helena IsoniemiDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
Santiago Lopez-BenHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdlBGi, Girona, Spain.
Irinel PopescuDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
Jean-Francois OuelletCHU de Québec - Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Catherine HubertDepartment of HBP Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Leuven, Belgium.
Jean-Marc RegimbeauDepartment of Oncology and Digestive Surgery, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France.
Jen-Kou LinDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Oleg G SkipenkoResearch Center of Surgery, Russian Academy of Medical Science, Moscow, Russia.
Francesco ArditoHepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
René AdamDepartment of Surgery, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe liver-first approach in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has gained wide consensus but its role is still to be clarified. We aimed to elucidate the outcome of the liver-first approach and to identify patients who benefit at most from this approach.

methodsPatients with synchronous CRLM included in the LiverMetSurvey registry between 2000 and 2017 were considered. Three strategies were analyzed, i.e. liver-first approach, colorectal resection followed by liver resection (primary-first), and simultaneous resection, and three groups of patients were analyzed, i.e. solitary metastasis, multiple unilobar CRLM, and multiple bilobar CRLM. In each group, patients from the three strategy groups were matched by propensity score analysis.

resultsOverall, 7360 patients were analyzed: 4415 primary-first, 552 liver-first, and 2393 simultaneous resections. Compared with the other groups, the liver-first group had more rectal tumors (58.0% vs. 31.2%) and higher hepatic tumor burden (more than three CRLMs: 34.8% vs. 24.0%; size > 50 mm: 35.6% vs. 22.8%; p < 0.001). In patients with solitary and multiple unilobar CRLM, survival was similar regardless of treatment strategy, whereas in patients with multiple bilobar metastases, the liver-first approach was an independent positive prognostic factor, both in unmatched patients (3-year survival 65.9% vs. primary-first 60.4%: hazard ratio [HR] 1.321, p = 0.031; vs. simultaneous resections 54.4%: HR 1.624, p < 0.001) and after propensity score matching (vs. primary-first: HR 1.667, p = 0.017; vs. simultaneous resections: HR 2.278, p = 0.003).

conclusionIn patients with synchronous CRLM, the surgical strategy should be decided according to the hepatic tumor burden. In the presence of multiple bilobar CRLM, the liver-first approach is associated with longer survival than the alternative approaches and should be evaluated as standard.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansLiverRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34212254
PMCPMC8590998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.