Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212218›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Scaling the peak and steady-state aerobic power of running and walking humans.

Heather M Bowes, Catriona A Burdon, Gregory E Peoples, Sean R Notley, Nigel A S Taylor

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Efficacy of estimating VOEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather M BowesCentre for Medical and Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Catriona A BurdonCentre for Medical and Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Gregory E PeoplesCentre for Medical and Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Sean R NotleyHuman and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Nigel A S TaylorCentre for Medical and Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia. nigelastaylor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3655-5249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe first aim of this experiment was to evaluate the appropriateness of linear and non-linear (allometric) models to scale peak aerobic power (oxygen consumption) against body mass. The possibilities that oxygen consumption would scale allometrically across the complete metabolic range, and that the scaling exponents would differ significantly between basal and maximal-exercise states, were then evaluated. It was further hypothesised that the scaling exponent would increase in a stepwise manner with elevations in exercise intensity. Finally, the utility of applying the scaling exponent derived for peak aerobic power to another population sample was evaluated.

methodsBasal, steady-state walking and peak (treadmill) oxygen-consumption data were measured using 60 relatively homogeneous men (18-40 year; 56.0-117.1 kg), recruited across five mass classes. Linear and allometric regressions were applied, with the utility of each scaling method evaluated.

resultsOxygen consumption scaled allometrically with body mass across the complete metabolic range, and was always superior to both ratiometric analysis and linear regression. The scaling exponent increased significantly from rest (mass

conclusionIt has been demonstrated that the oxygen consumption of healthy humans scales allometrically with body mass across the entire metabolic range. Moreover, only two scaling exponents (rest and exercise) were required to produce mass-independent outcomes from those data. Accordingly, ratiometric and linear regression analyses are not recommended as scaling methods.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBasal MetabolismBody WeightExerciseExercise TestHumansOxygen ConsumptionRunningWalkingYoung AdultAllometryBody massPeak aerobic powerPeak oxygen consumptionScalingSize

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.