Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212181›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2022

Conditional Cash Transfers to Incentivize Tuberculosis Screening: Description of a Novel Strategy for Contact Investigation in Rural South Africa.

Yeonsoo Baik, Colleen F Hanrahan, Lesego Mmolawa, Bareng A S Nonyane, Nicholas W Albaugh, Limakatso Lebina, Tsundzukani Siwelana, Neil Martinson, David W Dowdy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02808507 (Comparative Effectiveness/Implementation of TB Case Finding in Rural South Africa), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02808507 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Effectiveness/Implementation of TB Case Finding in Rural South Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2016 to 2020Enrolled4,852ConditionsTuberculosisArmsActive TB case finding
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Household- Versus Incentive-Based Contact Investigation for Tuberculosis in Rural South Africa: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cash transfers to enhance completion of TB screening among household contacts in rural Tanzania.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yeonsoo BaikDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7016-0438
Colleen F HanrahanDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lesego MmolawaPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Bareng A S NonyaneDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas W AlbaughDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Limakatso LebinaPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Tsundzukani SiwelanaPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Neil MartinsonPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
David W DowdyDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Innovative Contact Tracing Strategies for Detecting TB in Mobile Rural and Urban South African PopulationsR01AI147681 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DOWDY, DAVID WESLEY · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Comparative Effectiveness/Implementation of TB Case Finding in Rural South AfricaR01AI116787 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DOWDY, DAVID WESLEY · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
Using an implementation science approach to refine, implement and evaluate pilot strategies for tuberculosis contact tracing in South AfricaK01HL151977 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HANRAHAN, COLLEEN · 2021 to 2025
$804k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL151977NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116787NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding incentives to screen close contacts for tuberculosis (TB) is an alternative to household-based contact investigation. We aimed to characterize patients and contexts where this incentive-based strategy might be preferred.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial of TB contact investigation in Limpopo District, South Africa, conducted between 2016 and 2020. Twenty-eight clinics were randomly allocated to household-based vs incentive-based contact investigation. In the incentive-based arm, index participants and contacts received transport reimbursement and incentives for TB screening and microbiological diagnosis of contacts. We estimated differences in mean number of contacts per index participant with household-based vs incentive-based contact investigation overall and within subgroups of index participants.

resultsA total of 3776 contacts (1903 in the incentive-based and 1873 in the household-based arm) were referred by 2501 index participants. A higher proportion of contacts in the incentive-based than household-based arm were adults (72% vs 59%), reported chronic TB symptoms (25% vs 16%) or ever smoking (23% vs 11%). Index participants who walked or bicycled to a clinic referred 1.03 more contacts per index (95% confidence interval [CI], .48 to 1.57) through incentive-based than household-based investigation. Index participants living with >5 household members referred 0.48 more contacts per index (95% CI, .03 to .94) through household-based than incentive-based investigation.

conclusionsRelative to household-based investigation, incentive-based investigation identifies contacts likely at higher risk for active TB. Incentive-based investigation may be more appropriate for index participants who can easily access clinics, versus household-based investigation for patients with large households. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02808507.

Indexed as

Contact TracingTuberculosisAdultFamily CharacteristicsHumansMass ScreeningSouth Africacontact tracingincentiveindex patient epidemiologymotivationtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID34212181
PMCPMC8946721
OpenAlexW3173511450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.