Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212119›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2021

The SEEDS of Indigenous population health data linkage.

Robyn K Rowe, Stephanie Russo Carroll, Chyloe Healy, Desi Rodriguez-Lonebear, Jennifer D Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Indigenous epidemiology in Canada: Epistemic struggle towards evidence, authority, and governance.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  2. Cultural and contextual relevance of the Indigenous data in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Use of Population-Level Administrative Data in Developmental Science.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robyn K RoweSchool of Rural and Northern Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON., Canada, P3E2C6.
Stephanie Russo CarrollMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health and the Native Nations Institute at the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Chyloe HealyBlackfoot Confederacy Tribal Council, First Nations Health & Social Secretariat of Manitoba.
Desi Rodriguez-LonebearDepartment of Sociology and American Indian Studies, University of California Los Angeles.
Jennifer D WalkerSchool of Rural and Northern Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON., Canada, P3E2C6.
Laurentian University · CAFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally, the ways that Indigenous data are collected, used, stored, shared, and analyzed are advancing through Indigenous data governance movements. However, these discussions do not always include the increasingly sensitive nature of linking Indigenous population health (IPH) data. During the International Population Data Linkage Network Conference in September of 2018, Indigenous people from three countries (Canada, New Zealand, and the United States) gathered and set the tone for discussions around Indigenous-driven IPH data linkage.

objectivesCentering IPH data linkage and research priorities at the conference led to budding discussions from diverse Indigenous populations to share and build on current IPH data linkage themes. This paper provides a braided summary of those discussions which resulted in the SEEDS principles for use when linking IPH data.

methodsDuring the Conference, two sessions and a keynote were Indigenous-led and hosted by international collaborators that focused on regional perspectives on IPH data linkage. A retrospective document analysis of notes, discussions, and artistic contributions gathered from the conference resulted in a summary of shared common approaches to the linkage of IPH data.

resultsThe SEEDS Principles emerge as collective report that outlines a living and expanding set of guiding principles that: 1) prioritizes Indigenous Peoples' right to Self-determination; 2) makes space for Indigenous Peoples to Exercise sovereignty; 3) adheres to Ethical protocols; 4) acknowledges and respects Data stewardship and governance, and; 5) works to Support reconciliation between Indigenous nations and settler states.

conclusionEach of the elements of SEEDS need to be enacted together to create a positive data linkage environment. When implemented together, the SEEDS Principles can lead to more meaningful research and improved Indigenous data governance. The mindful implementation of SEEDS could lead to better measurements of health progress through linkages that are critical to enhancing health care policy and improving health and wellness outcomes for Indigenous nations.

Indexed as

Indigenous PeoplesPopulation GroupsCanadaHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesCARE principlesdata governancedata linkagedata principlesdata sovereigntyIndigenousIPHpopulation healthSEEDS principles

Identifiers

PMID34212119
PMCPMC8218891
OpenAlexW3176469351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.