Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212111›Full record

ArticleMDM policy & practice

Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Bevacizumab With First-Line Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Studies in Three Canadian Provinces.

Reka E Pataky, Jaclyn Beca, David Tran, Wei Fang Dai, Erind Dvorani, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Stuart Peacock, Riaz Alvi, Winson Y Cheung, Craig C Earle and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Reka E PatakyBC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0159-582X
Jaclyn BecaCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8858-9566
David TranSaskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Wei Fang DaiCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erind DvoraniICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wanrudee IsaranuwatchaiCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stuart PeacockBC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Riaz AlviSaskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Winson Y CheungCancer Care Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Craig C EarleICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Scott GavuraCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kelvin K W ChanCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-3057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

colorectal cancercost-effectivenesslinked health dataoncologyreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID34212111
PMCPMC8216386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.