ReviewBurns & trauma2021
Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds.
Review in Burns & trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2023Pooled it
- In-hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices pocket infection.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Trial
- Negative pressure wound therapy promotes wound healing by down-regulating miR-155 expression in granulation tissue of diabetic foot ulcers.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- WTAP-mediated m6A RNA methylation promotes diabetic foot ulcer healing under negative pressure wound therapy.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Interlinked CXCR4-Mediated Feedback Loop Among Signaling Pathways in Diabetic Wound Healing.Current diabetes reviews · 2026Review
- Negative pressure-induced fibroblast activation for wound healing through the Piezo1-CaBurns & trauma · 2026Article
- Regenerative therapies for complex diabetic foot wounds: a therapeutic challenge.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2026Article
- Consensus statement on the clinical application of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for diabetic foot ulcers (2025 Edition).International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Update on the impact of lipid and glucose control on diabetic wound healing.Metabolism open · 2025Review
- Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Treatment of Complicated Wounds of the Foot and Lower Limb in Diabetic Patients: A Retrospective Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of ON101 with general wound care for diabetic foot ulcers among patients with type 2 diabetes in Singapore: Analysis of a multi-ethnic country in Asia.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Tailored Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with instillation in diabetic, hypertensive, and obese patients-when guideline treatment is not enough: a case series and a proposal for the ANSWER score.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Non-coding RNAs in adipose-derived stem cell exosomes: Mechanisms, therapeutic potential, and challenges in wound healing.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Combined negative pressure wound therapy with new wound dressings to repair a ruptured giant omphalocele in a neonate: a case report and literature review.BMC pediatrics · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effect of antibiotic bone cement on Wagner grade 3 or 4 diabetic foot ulcer in heel and non-heel areas: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- A microenvironment-adaptive GelMA-ODex@RRHD hydrogel for responsive release of HRegenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Necrotizing Fasciitis (2025 Edition).Burns & trauma · 2025Article
- Targeting oxidative damage in diabetic foot ulcers: integrative strategies involving antioxidant drugs and nanotechnologies.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because China is becoming an aging society, the incidence of diabetes and diabetic foot have been increasing. Diabetic foot has become one of the main health-related killers due to its high disability and mortality rates. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is one of the most effective techniques for the treatment of diabetic foot wounds and great progress, both in terms of research and its clinical application, has been made in the last 20 years of its development. However, due to the complex pathogenesis and management of diabetic foot, irregular application of NPWT often leads to complications, such as infection, bleeding and necrosis, that seriously affect its treatment outcomes. In 2020, under the leadership of Burns, Trauma and Tissue Repair Committee of the Cross-Straits Medicine Exchange Association, the writing group for 'Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds' was established with the participation of scholars from the specialized areas of burns, endocrinology, vascular surgery, orthopedics and wound repair. Drawing on evidence-based practice suggested by the latest clinical research, this consensus proposes the best clinical practice guidelines for the application and prognostic evaluation of NPWT for diabetic foot. The consensus aims to support the formation of standardized treatment schemes that clinicians can refer to when treating cases of diabetic foot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.