Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212022›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses.

Shollie M Falkenberg, Rohana P Dassanayake, Brett Terhaar, Julia F Ridpath, John D Neill, James A Roth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular and Replication Dynamic Profiling of Regionally ImportantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Efficacy of Vaccination with the DIVENCEVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shollie M FalkenbergRuminant Disease and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, United States.
Rohana P DassanayakeRuminant Disease and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, United States.
Brett TerhaarFrontier Veterinary Research and Consulting, Winterset, IA, United States.
Julia F RidpathRidpath Consulting, LLC, Gilbert, IA, United States.
John D NeillRuminant Disease and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, United States.
James A RothDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Agricultural Research Service · USIowa State University · USNational Animal Disease Center · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigenic differences between bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine strains and field isolates can lead to reduced vaccine efficacy. Historically, antigenic differences among BVDV strains were evaluated using techniques based on polyclonal and monoclonal antibody activity. The most common method for antigenic comparison among BVDV isolates is determination of virus neutralization titer (VNT). BVDV antigenic comparisons using VNT only account for the humoral component of the adaptive immune response, and not cell mediated immunity (CMI) giving an incomplete picture of protective responses. Currently, little data is available regarding potential antigenic differences between BVDV vaccine strains and field isolates as measured by CMI responses. The goal of the current paper is to evaluate two groups of cattle that differed in the frequency they were vaccinated, to determine if similar trends in CMI responses exist within each respective group when stimulated with antigenically different BVDV strains. Data from the current study demonstrated variability in the CMI response is associated with the viral strain used for stimulation. Variability in IFN-γ mRNA expression was most pronounced in the CD4

Indexed as

antigenic diversityantigenicitybovine viral diarrhea viruscell mediated responsevirus neutralizing titer

Identifiers

PMID34212022
PMCPMC8239304
OpenAlexW3168148884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.