ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021
A Comparison of Treatment Options for Type 1 and Type 2 Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Case Series Study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the factors associated with initial treatment failure in cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective case-control study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Implanted in the Scar: A Case Report of Diagnosis and Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2026Article
- A scoring system predicts the adverse outcomes for cesarean scar pregnancy treated with transvaginal hysterotomy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical investigation of fertility after uterine artery embolization combined with dilation and curettage(D&C) or D&C alone for cesarean scar pregnancies.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Article
- Systematic evaluation of the efficacy of treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
- Complex Blood Supply Patterns in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Insights from Digital Subtraction Angiography Imaging.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- The Efficacy and Health Economics of Different Treatments for Type 1 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Curettage With and Without Uterine Artery Embolization on Controlling Intraoperative Blood Loss for a Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treatment: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.