Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34211615›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2021

Machine Learning of Schizophrenia Detection with Structural and Functional Neuroimaging.

Dafa Shi, Yanfei Li, Haoran Zhang, Xiang Yao, Siyuan Wang, Guangsong Wang, Ke Ren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dafa ShiDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8180-7882
Yanfei LiDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7370-6763
Haoran ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6026-2219
Xiang YaoDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-3274
Siyuan WangDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-0076
Guangsong WangDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China.
Ke RenDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-055X
Xiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SZ) is a severe psychiatric illness, and it affects around 1% of the general population; however, its reliable diagnosis is challenging. Functional MRI (fMRI) and structural MRI (sMRI) are useful techniques for investigating the functional and structural abnormalities of the human brain, and a growing number of studies have reported that multimodal brain data can improve diagnostic accuracy. Machine learning (ML) is widely used in the diagnosis of neuroscience and neuropsychiatry diseases, and it can obtain high accuracy. However, the conventional ML which concatenated the features into a longer feature vector could not be sufficiently effective to combine different features from different modalities. There are considerable controversies over the use of global signal regression (GSR), and few studies have explored the role of GSR in ML in diagnosing neurological diseases. The current study utilized fMRI and sMRI data to implement a new method named multimodal imaging and multilevel characterization with multiclassifier (M3) to classify SZs and healthy controls (HCs) and investigate the influence of GSR in SZ classification. We found that when we used Brainnetome 246 atlas and without performed GSR, our method obtained a classification accuracy of 83.49%, with a sensitivity of 68.69%, a specificity of 93.75%, and an AUC of 0.8491, respectively. We also got great classification performances with different processing methods (with/without GSR and different brain parcellation schemes). We found that the accuracy and specificity of the models without GSR were higher than that of the models with GSR. Our findings indicate that the M3 method is an effective tool to distinguish SZs from HCs, and it can identify discriminative regions to detect SZ to explore the neural mechanisms underlying SZ. The global signal may contain important neuronal information; it can improve the accuracy and specificity of SZ detection.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingSchizophreniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34211615
PMCPMC8208855
OpenAlexW3166821640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.