Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34211584›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2021

Carotid intraplaque neovascularisation as a predictive factor for future vascular events in patients with mild and moderate carotid stenosis: an observational prospective study.

Liuping Cui, Yingqi Xing, Yangyang Zhou, Lijuan Wang, Kangding Liu, Daofu Zhang, Ying Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liuping CuiDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yingqi XingDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yangyang ZhouDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lijuan WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Kangding LiuDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-347X
Daofu ZhangDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ying ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Xinmin Street 71, Changchun, 130021, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6396-7815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraplaque neovascularisation (IPN) increases the vulnerability of plaques, which makes them more likely to rupture and increases the risk of vascular events. However, it is unclear whether IPN can predict future vascular events (stroke recurrence and cardiovascular events). Previous studies on IPN have focused on patients with severe stenosis but overlooked patients with mild and moderate stenosis. This study aimed to investigate whether IPN assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in patients with mild and moderate degrees of stenosis is associated with future vascular events.

methodsOne hundred and twenty-one patients participated in this study. 76 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the final dataset of the study. IPN was graded from 0 to 2 according to the extent of the microbubbles assessed using CEUS. The degree of carotid stenosis was graded as mild, moderate, or severe. We recorded future vascular events during the follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate risk factors for future vascular events.

resultsAfter a follow-up period of 30 ± 6 months, 30 patients (39.5%) experienced subsequent vascular events. Compared with the 'non-recurrent' group, the 'recurrent' group showed a higher proportion of grade 2 neovascularisation (

conclusionIPN by CEUS was an independent predictor of future vascular events in patients with recent ischemic stroke, and the high proportion of neovascularisation in patients with mild and moderate stenosis requires more attention.

Indexed as

carotid intraplaque neovascularisationcarotid stenosiscontrast-enhanced ultrasonographyischaemic strokevascular event recurrence

Identifiers

PMID34211584
PMCPMC8216344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.