Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34211583›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2021

An algorithm using clinical data to predict the optimal individual glucocorticoid dosage to treat multiple sclerosis relapses.

Judit Gili-Kovács, Robert Hoepner, Anke Salmen, Maud Bagnoud, Ralf Gold, Andrew Chan, Myriam Briner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Judit Gili-KovácsDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, Bern, 3010, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2134-1416
Robert HoepnerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-7021
Anke SalmenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4751-299X
Maud BagnoudDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Ralf GoldDepartment of Neurology, St Josef-Hospital/Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andrew ChanDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Myriam BrinerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Bern · CHSt. Josef-Hospital · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlucocorticoid (GC) pulse therapy is used for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse treatment; however, GC resistance is a common problem. Considering that GC dosing is individual with several response-influencing factors, establishing a predictive model, which supports clinicians to estimate the maximum GC dose above which no additional therapeutic value can be expected presents a huge clinical need.

methodWe established two, independent retrospective cohorts of MS patients. The first was an explorative cohort for model generation, while the second was established for its validation. Using the explorative cohort, a multivariate regression analysis with the GC dose used as the dependent variable and serum vitamin D (25D) concentration, sex, age, EDSS, contrast enhancement on cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), immune therapy, and the involvement of the optic nerve as independent variables was established.

resultsIn the explorative cohort, 113 MS patients were included. 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) serum concentration and the presence of optic neuritis were independent predictors of the GC dose needed to treat MS relapses [(25D): -25.95 (95% confidence interval (CI)): -47.40 to -4.49;

conclusionOur model could predict the GC dose given in clinical, routine MS relapse care, above which clinicians estimate no further benefit. Further studies should validate and improve our algorithm to help the implementation of predictive models in GC dosing.

Indexed as

multiple sclerosisrelapse treatmentsteroid dosevitamin D

Identifiers

PMID34211583
PMCPMC8216377
OpenAlexW3174542015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.