Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34211380›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021

Design Considerations for Long Term Non-invasive Brain Computer Interface Training With Tetraplegic CYBATHLON Pilot.

Neethu Robinson, Tushar Chouhan, Ernest Mihelj, Paulina Kratka, Frédéric Debraine, Nicole Wenderoth, Cuntai Guan, Rea Lehner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Neethu RobinsonSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Tushar ChouhanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Ernest MiheljNeural Control of Movement Lab, Department of Health Science and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paulina KratkaNeural Control of Movement Lab, Department of Health Science and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frédéric DebraineNeural Control of Movement Lab, Department of Health Science and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicole WenderothFuture Health Technologies, Singapore-ETH Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Cuntai GuanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Rea LehnerFuture Health Technologies, Singapore-ETH Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies in the recent past have demonstrated how Brain Computer Interface (BCI) technology can uncover the neural mechanisms underlying various tasks and translate them into control commands. While a multitude of studies have demonstrated the theoretic potential of BCI, a point of concern is that the studies are still confined to lab settings and mostly limited to healthy, able-bodied subjects. The CYBATHLON 2020 BCI race represents an opportunity to further develop BCI design strategies for use in real-time applications with a tetraplegic end user. In this study, as part of the preparation to participate in CYBATHLON 2020 BCI race, we investigate the design aspects of BCI in relation to the choice of its components, in particular, the type of calibration paradigm and its relevance for long-term use. The end goal was to develop a user-friendly and engaging interface suited for long-term use, especially for a spinal-cord injured (SCI) patient. We compared the efficacy of conventional open-loop calibration paradigms with real-time closed-loop paradigms, using pre-trained BCI decoders. Various indicators of performance were analyzed for this study, including the resulting classification performance, game completion time, brain activation maps, and also subjective feedback from the pilot. Our results show that the closed-loop calibration paradigms with real-time feedback is more engaging for the pilot. They also show an indication of achieving better online median classification performance as compared to conventional calibration paradigms (

Indexed as

brain computer interfaceCybathlonelectroencephalographymotor assistancetetraplegia

Identifiers

PMID34211380
PMCPMC8239283
OpenAlexW3171116091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.