Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34211314›Full record

ArticlePediatric health, medicine and therapeutics2021

Expressed Breast Milk Contamination in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Suzan Gad, Mohamed M Sheta, Abeer I Al-Khalafawi, Heba A Abu El-Fadl, Maha Anany, Shaimaa Sahmoud, Mona Karem Amin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methicillin-ResistantBioMed research international · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzan GadPediatrics and Neonatology Department, Suez Canal University Faculty of Medicine, Ismailia, Egypt.
Mohamed M ShetaPediatrics and Neonatology Department, Mansoura General Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.
Abeer I Al-KhalafawiNeonatology Department, Saqr Hospital, MOH, Ras Alkheima, United Arab Emirates.
Heba A Abu El-FadlPediatrics and Neonatology Department, Suez Canal University Faculty of Medicine, Ismailia, Egypt.
Maha AnanyPediatrics and Neonatology Department, Suez Canal University Faculty of Medicine, Ismailia, Egypt.
Shaimaa SahmoudPediatrics and Neonatology Department, Suez Canal University Faculty of Medicine, Ismailia, Egypt.
Mona Karem AminPediatrics and Neonatology Department, Suez Canal University Faculty of Medicine, Ismailia, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8316-884X
Suez Canal University · EGMafraq Hospital · AEMansoura University Hospital · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe health benefits of breastfeeding are well known. However, some ill babies including those admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) cannot be directly breastfed. In this situation, expressed breast milk (EBM) can be used. However, breast milk is not always sterile and may be contaminated by many microorganisms. EBM contamination is probably attributed to improper technical and hygienic factors and may pose significant threats to the newborn baby. The present study aimed to document the prevalence of EBM contamination in NICU and to uncover the relevant risk factors. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThe study included 118 mothers who could express breast milk for their own neonates admitted to the NICU. A checklist was used to document the steps the mothers followed during expression of milk and all steps of handling until the EBM reached the NICU. A 1 mL sample of EBM was obtained and sent to the microbiology laboratory within 20 minutes. Data obtained from the present study are expressed as number and percentage or mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical calculations were computed using SPSS 25.

resultsIn the present study, 106 (89.8%) out of the assessed 118 EBM samples were contaminated. Hygienic factors related to EBM contamination included hand only wash, possible recontamination of hands during turning taps off, lack of using cotton pads or cloth piece on nipple and breast cleaning by water only. Other factors related to EBM contamination included container cleaning by water only, fresh milk refrigeration after > 4 hours, adding freshly expressed warm breast milk to refrigerated milk expressed earlier in the same day, milk transport in plastic bags with ice packs and longer transportation time. In the contaminated samples, the most commonly isolated organisms included

conclusionThe present study identified bacterial contamination in about 90% of EBM samples delivered to NICU infants. Factors related to EBM contamination include hygienic, storage and transport factors.

Indexed as

breastfeedingexpressed breast milkNICU

Identifiers

PMID34211314
PMCPMC8242104
OpenAlexW3175329277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.